Skip to content
Shane Morris

#11Shane Morris

QB·Central Michigan·20176.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Shane Morris is a Clutch Passer for Central Michigan. Shane's 2017 season ranks in the 25th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 501 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Shane Morris's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
249/446 Comp/Att3237 Pass yards27 Pass TD17 INT55.8% Comp %
Rushing
93 Rush yards3 Rush TD88 Carries1.1 Yards/carry
Punting
1 Punts43 Punt yards43.0 Yards/punt43 Long0 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency25
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat35
  • Consistency64
  • Clutch80
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)25th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency64th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.22 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.74 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Kansas (SP+ -15).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7400.74Wk 1 vs Rhode Island: -0.00 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kansas: +0.74 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Syracuse: -0.02 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami (OH): +0.04 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Boston College: -0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Ohio: +0.17 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Toledo: +0.05 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Ball State: +0.56 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Western Michigan: +0.48 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.29 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kent State: +0.45 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Northern Illinois: +0.10 EPA/play13Wk 1 vs Wyoming: +0.15 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsRhode IslandW30-2725/492261149.0320-0.00
2@KansasW45-27-14.828/374675093.83200.74
3@SyracuseL17-414.023/462772226.0-10-0.02
4vsMiami (OH)L14-31-2.215/331951231.93310.04
5@Boston CollegeL8-284.621/42171036.5-190-0.22
6@OhioW26-233.325/352492148.3700.17
7vsToledoL10-306.617/37182128.12300.05
8@Ball StateW56-9-19.716/211994085.4200.56
10@Western MichiganW35-28-2.412/302432066.12720.48
11vsEastern MichiganW42-30-5.311/181553063.6-2200.29
12@Kent StateW42-23-20.214/222972182.55000.45
13vsNorthern IllinoisW31-24-1.419/372473131.4-3700.10
1vsWyomingL14-37-2.523/393291416.7-3400.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.1%
Passing plays
95.1%
Rushing plays
15.3%
Standard downs
48.7%
Passing downs
73.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
0.29
Pass / Rush EPA
0.19 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.830−0.32
EPA per play · 2017 · 13 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.