#26Sedrick Irvin

RB·Stanford·2025

Sedrick Irvin is a Committee Back for Stanford. Sedrick's 2025 season produced -6.8 total EPA across 38 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Sedrick Irvin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

118 Rush yards1 Rush TD41 Carries2.9 Yards/carry

Receiving

2 Receptions13 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume19
Explosiveness0
Consistency52
Receiving54

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency52th %ile · average

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 0.94 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs San José State (SP+ -14).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
0	@Hawai'i	L20-23	1.7	10	46	4.6	0	—	—	—	—
2	@BYU	L3-27	15.9	1	1	1.0	0	—	—	—	-0.90
3	vsBoston College	W30-20	-8.5	1	-1	-1.0	0	—	—	—	-1.29
4	@Virginia	L20-48	11.1	2	5	2.5	0	—	—	—	-0.39
5	vsSan José State	W30-29	-14.3	1	1	1.0	1	—	—	—	0.94
8	vsFlorida State	W20-13	7.2	1	1	1.0	0	—	—	—	-0.33
9	@Miami	L7-42	20.7	3	3	1.0	0	1	8	0	-0.25
10	vsPittsburgh	L20-35	8.4	8	24	3.0	0	1	5	0	-0.24
11	@North Carolina	L15-20	-6.6	4	9	2.3	0	—	—	—	-0.54
14	vsNotre Dame	L20-49	24.4	10	29	2.9	0	—	—	—	-0.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

6.7%

Passing plays

2.0%

Rushing plays

12.9%

Standard downs

7.9%

Passing downs

4.3%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: -0.22
Passing downs: -0.04
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.52 / -0.11

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).