Skip to content
Riley Leonard

#13Riley Leonard

QB·Notre Dame·202420228.2 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Riley Leonard is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Notre Dame. Riley's 2024 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 572 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Riley Leonard's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
269/403 Comp/Att2861 Pass yards21 Pass TD8 INT66.7% Comp %
Rushing
906 Rush yards17 Rush TD184 Carries4.9 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency84
  • Clutch88
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.71 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs Stanford (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Casey ThompsonNebraska0.52812.6351.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7100.71Wk 1 vs Texas A&M: +0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Northern Illinois: +0.13 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Purdue: +0.61 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Miami (OH): +0.41 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Louisville: +0.20 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Stanford: +0.71 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Georgia Tech: +0.26 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Navy: +0.61 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Florida State: +0.43 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Virginia: +0.10 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Army: +0.48 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs USC: +0.33 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@Texas A&MW23-1317.018/301580066.76300.20
2vsNorthern IllinoisL14-16-3.520/321630225.81610.13
3@PurdueW66-7-16.211/161120093.810030.61
4vsMiami (OH)W28-31.316/251541083.414320.41
5vsLouisvilleW31-2413.617/231632074.15210.20
7vsStanfordW49-7-8.216/222293094.53110.71
8vsGeorgia TechW31-131.920/292030171.55120.26
9vsNavyW51-143.513/211782090.08310.61
11vsFlorida StateW52-3-3.214/272151087.57020.43
12vsVirginiaW35-14-5.122/332143150.03200.10
13vsArmyW49-149.210/131482093.73000.48
14@USCW49-3511.917/221552184.05010.33
20vsPenn StateW27-2424.615/232231280.3351
20vsGeorgiaW23-1024.315/24901070.9800
20vsIndianaW27-1720.123/322011167.1301
20vsOhio StateL23-3431.222/312552088.1401

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.9%
Passing plays
90.0%
Rushing plays
31.0%
Standard downs
54.0%
Passing downs
67.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.28
Passing downs
0.52
Pass / Rush EPA
0.29 / 0.51

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.330−0.102024
EPA per play · 2022 — 2024 · 29 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Duke
6.5
222.1
2024Notre Dame
8.2
296.9

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.