Skip to content
Rashod Owens
Rashod Owens

#10Rashod Owens

WR·Oklahoma State·2024

Rashod Owens is a Versatile WR for Oklahoma State. Rashod's 2024 season produced 48.1 total EPA across 31 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Rashod Owens's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Receiving
32 Receptions515 Rec yards4 Rec TD16.1 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume14
  • Explosiveness61
  • Consistency84
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • ▸Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • ▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • ▸High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • ▸10 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • ▸Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • ▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.16 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • ▸Peak game: 3.48 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs South Dakota State.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+3.480−3.48Wk 1 vs South Dakota State: +3.48 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +1.15 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tulsa: +1.73 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Utah: +1.98 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kansas State: +0.57 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs West Virginia: +2.95 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs BYU: +1.51 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Baylor: +0.94 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arizona State: +0.75 EPA/play10Wk 13 vs Texas Tech: +1.98 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsSouth Dakota StateW44-20—38127.01583.48
2vsArkansasW39-3111.056412.80191.15
3@TulsaW45-10-20.634314.30251.73
4vsUtahL19-227.734214.01251.98
5@Kansas StateL20-4214.145313.30250.57
6vsWest VirginiaL14-382.1188.0182.95
8@BYUL35-3815.322010.00171.51
9@BaylorL28-388.436220.70470.94
10vsArizona StateL21-429.42189.00120.75
13vsTexas TechL48-564.3612420.71301.98

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
5.0%
Passing plays
8.6%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
4.7%
Passing downs
5.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.28
Passing downs
1.98
Pass / Rush EPA
1.55 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.