Skip to content
Noah Bennee

#89Noah Bennee

TE·Utah·2026

Noah Bennee is a Vertical Threat TE for Utah.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Noah Bennee's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
5 Receptions148 Rec yards2 Rec TD29.6 Yards/rec

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

6
Targets
14.2y
Avg depth
14.4y
After catch
83%
Catch rate

The ball travels 14.2 yards in the air on an average target 5.3 yards deeper than the median. Another 14.4 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
2
100% · 92y
short
1
0% · 0y
2
100% · 55y
1
100% · 1y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume12
  • Explosiveness100
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down50
Player type
Vertical Threat TE

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among TEs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • Peak game: 4.47 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Idaho.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+4.4704.47Wk 1 vs Idaho: +4.47 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Arkansas: +1.25 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsIdahoW66-1413535.01354.47
2vsArkansasW43-103.3411328.31571.25

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
4.3%
Passing plays
10.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
5.3%
Passing downs
0.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.25
Passing downs
Pass / Rush EPA
1.25 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.