Skip to content
Michael Turner

#23Michael Turner

Michael Turner is a Committee Back for Baylor. Michael's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 60 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Michael Turner's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
320 Rush yards1 Rush TD65 Carries4.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
6 Receptions21 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume36
  • Explosiveness38
  • Consistency31
  • Receiving33
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency31th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.15 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Arizona (SP+ 12).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4400.44Wk 3 vs Samford: +0.32 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Oklahoma State: -0.13 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Kansas State: +0.34 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs TCU: +0.23 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Cincinnati: +0.15 EPA/play9Wk 12 vs Utah: -0.44 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona: +0.38 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
3vsSamfordW42-76366.000.32
5@Oklahoma StateW45-27-15.113473.60110-0.13
6vsKansas StateW35-347.07385.411-500.34
8@TCUL36-428.312685.700.23
9@CincinnatiL20-414.514906.4031900.15
12vsUtahL28-5522.2451.30-0.44
13@ArizonaL17-4112.09364.001600.38

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.5%
Passing plays
2.3%
Rushing plays
25.6%
Standard downs
13.6%
Passing downs
9.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.06
Passing downs
0.66
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.02 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.