Skip to content
Michael Benefield
Michael Benefield

Michael Benefield

Michael Benefield is a Committee Back for Kennesaw State. Michael's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 128 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Michael Benefield's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing
542 Rush yards5 Rush TD138 Carries3.9 Yards/carry
Receiving
5 Receptions15 Rec yards0 Rec TD3.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume54
  • Explosiveness18
  • Consistency11
  • Receiving15
Player type
Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency11th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.12 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.42 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Jacksonville State (SP+ -1).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8500.85Wk 1 vs UTSA: -0.20 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Louisiana: -0.12 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs San José State: -0.02 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs UT Martin: -0.85 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Jacksonville State: +0.42 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.21 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Liberty: -0.01 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Western Kentucky: +0.34 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: -0.16 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Sam Houston: +0.03 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida International: -0.37 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: -0.10 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@UTSAL16-282.2362.00-0.20
2vsLouisianaL10-344.89313.40-0.12
3@San José StateL10-31-5.512332.80260-0.02
5vsUT MartinL13-246122.00-0.85
6vsJacksonville StateL24-63-1.0171126.610.42
8@Middle TennesseeL5-14-24.412484.00-0.21
9vsLibertyW27-240.216543.41100-0.01
10@Western KentuckyL14-31-2.216986.111700.34
11@UTEPL35-43-22.717311.81120-0.16
12vsSam HoustonL17-23-6.913433.310.03
13vsFlorida InternationalW27-26-12.18384.80-0.37
14@Louisiana TechL0-33-11.69364.00-0.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
18.8%
Passing plays
1.6%
Rushing plays
31.1%
Standard downs
22.5%
Passing downs
12.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
-0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.26 / -0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.