Skip to content
Micah Ford

#20Micah Ford

Micah Ford is a Featured Back for Stanford. Micah's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 159 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Micah Ford's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
643 Rush yards4 Rush TD145 Carries4.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
11 Receptions119 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume79
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency0
  • Receiving39
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.11 EPA/play decline from first to second half.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3300.33Wk 2 vs BYU: -0.20 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Boston College: +0.33 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Virginia: +0.24 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs San José State: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs SMU: -0.15 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida State: -0.12 EPA/play8Wk 11 vs North Carolina: +0.18 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs California: +0.15 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0@Hawai'iL20-231.7261134.31220
2@BYUL3-2715.912211.80170-0.20
3vsBoston CollegeW30-20-8.5171579.210.33
4@VirginiaL20-4811.113443.411400.24
5vsSan José StateW30-29-14.37121.704640-0.07
7@SMUL10-3413.416533.30-0.15
8vsFlorida StateW20-137.28253.10-0.12
11@North CarolinaL15-20-6.617684.0023500.18
13vsCaliforniaW31-10-3.2291505.211700.15

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
27.5%
Passing plays
5.9%
Rushing plays
51.8%
Standard downs
34.2%
Passing downs
12.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.08
Passing downs
0.05
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.06

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.