Skip to content
Mason Fine

#6Mason Fine

QB·North Texas·201820177.1 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Mason Fine is a 2-year Clutch Passer for North Texas. Mason's 2017 season ranks in the 20th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 529 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Mason Fine's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2017 Production

Passing
323/510 Comp/Att4044 Pass yards31 Pass TD15 INT63.3% Comp %
Rushing
17 Rush yards1 Rush TD106 Carries0.2 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2017 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency20
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat23
  • Consistency78
  • Clutch98
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)20th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency78th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.19 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 7 vs UTSA (SP+ -3).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7200.72Wk 1 vs Lamar: +0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs SMU: +0.35 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Iowa: +0.07 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UAB: +0.33 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Southern Miss: +0.43 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs UTSA: +0.72 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Old Dominion: +0.27 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Louisiana Tech: +0.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.33 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Army: +0.56 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Rice: -0.03 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Florida Atlantic: +0.13 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Troy: +0.10 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsLamarW59-1415/212243080.1100.44
2@SMUL32-54-2.932/474243254.5200.35
3@IowaL14-319.816/261670134.3-200.07
4vsUABW46-4315/292613079.81800.33
5@Southern MissW43-28-3.424/403662180.0400.43
7vsUTSAW29-26-2.520/343543186.6-310.72
8@Florida AtlanticL31-695.131/472832261.53200.32
9vsOld DominionW45-38-16.825/363091152.7800.27
10@Louisiana TechW24-23-5.522/362031144.51600.00
11vsUTEPW45-10-27.423/352134091.71700.33
12vsArmyW52-49-5.324/363864190.7-400.56
13@RiceW30-14-23.618/251951135.1-150-0.03
14@Florida AtlanticL17-415.128/443561240.0100.13
1vsTroyL30-501.630/543033227.1-5800.10

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.9%
Passing plays
98.3%
Rushing plays
15.7%
Standard downs
52.7%
Passing downs
70.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.17
Passing downs
0.46
Pass / Rush EPA
0.31 / 0.01

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.800−0.102018
EPA per play · 2017 — 2018 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2017North Texas
7.1
253.8
2018North Texas
5.5
196.1

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.