Skip to content
Malae Fonoti

#21Malae Fonoti

Malae Fonoti is a Explosive Back for Missouri.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Malae Fonoti's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
18 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency83
  • Volume11
  • Explosiveness60
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving0
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)83th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Above-average efficiency for the RB position (83th percentile).
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDEPA/play
1vsArkansas-Pine BluffW54-143186.000.28

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
3.8%
Passing plays
0.0%
Rushing plays
6.8%
Standard downs
3.3%
Passing downs
5.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
-0.04
Pass / Rush EPA
— / 0.28

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.