Skip to content
Malachi Toney

#1Malachi Toney

WR·Miami·2026

Malachi Toney is a Vertical Threat WR for Miami.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

11%
projected
band 8%'25 15%15%

Regressed toward the WR mean. Model correlation r≈0.47 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Malachi Toney's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Receiving
16 Receptions330 Rec yards4 Rec TD20.6 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Punt returns22 PR yards0 PR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

14
Targets
13.1y
Avg depth
7.2y
After catch
93%
Catch rate

The ball travels 13.1 yards in the air on an average target 4.1 yards deeper than the median. Another 7.2 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
1
100% · 39y
0
1
100% · 52y
short
6
100% · 127y
1
100% · 11y
5
80% · 29y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume34
  • Explosiveness91
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Vertical Threat WR

Elite deep receiver who stretches the field. Wins downfield, commands safety attention, and creates the threat that opens underneath routes.

Downfield threatYAC upsideCreates space for teammates
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 1.80 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Florida A&M.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8001.80Wk 1 vs Stanford: +1.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Florida A&M: +1.80 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@StanfordW45-6-4.71223419.53481.40
2vsFlorida A&MW77-749624.01521.80

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.9%
Passing plays
27.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
10.8%
Passing downs
17.4%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.77
Passing downs
0.53
Pass / Rush EPA
1.44 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.