Skip to content
Luke Weaver

#3Luke Weaver

Luke Weaver is a Volume Passer for San José State. Luke's 2026 season ranks in the 35th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 119 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Luke Weaver's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
66/105 Comp/Att788 Pass yards8 Pass TD1 INT62.9% Comp %
Rushing
96 Rush yards1 Rush TD28 Carries3.4 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency35
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat47
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch32
Player type
Volume Passer

High-rep offense that leans on this QB's arm — value comes through cumulative production across a high number of plays.

High play countFranchise-volume role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)35th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.37 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Cal Poly.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3700.37Wk 1 vs Eastern Michigan: +0.31 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Cal Poly: +0.37 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
0@USCL26-4217.721/322342094.8421
1@Eastern MichiganW27-21-15.623/393163159.41000.31
2vsCal PolyW30-2022/342383026.04400.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
62.4%
Passing plays
99.1%
Rushing plays
26.5%
Standard downs
57.7%
Passing downs
71.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.38
Passing downs
0.34
Pass / Rush EPA
0.43 / 0.14

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.