Skip to content
Lewis Bond

#11Lewis Bond

Lewis Bond is a Slot Specialist WR for Boston College. Lewis's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 119 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Lewis Bond's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
89 Receptions1010 Rec yards1 Rec TD11.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume42
  • Explosiveness29
  • Consistency74
  • Pass-Down93
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.17 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.52 EPA/play in Wk 14 vs Syracuse (SP+ -13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Javion PoseyFlorida Atlantic0.4501.423.8

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.5201.52Wk 1 vs Fordham: +0.73 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Michigan State: +0.08 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Stanford: +0.21 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs California: +0.80 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Pittsburgh: -0.16 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Clemson: +1.39 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs UConn: +0.96 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs Louisville: -0.08 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Notre Dame: +0.73 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs SMU: +0.52 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Georgia Tech: +0.40 EPA/play12Wk 14 vs Syracuse: +1.52 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsFordhamW66-101113812.50320.73
2@Michigan StateL40-42-3.411908.20190.08
3@StanfordL20-30-11.87476.70110.21
5vsCaliforniaL24-28-3.277711.00160.80
6@PittsburghL7-488.42147.009-0.16
7vsClemsonL10-419.577010.00171.39
8vsUConnL23-385.156913.80270.96
9@LouisvilleL24-3812.46427.0110-0.08
10vsNotre DameL10-2524.489211.50220.73
11vsSMUL13-4513.499410.40220.52
12vsGeorgia TechL34-369.3810613.30320.40
14@SyracuseW34-12-13.1817121.40541.52

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
14.8%
Passing plays
24.7%
Rushing plays
1.7%
Standard downs
11.8%
Passing downs
21.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.42
Passing downs
0.68
Pass / Rush EPA
0.57 / -0.12

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Lewis Bond Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Boston College · Gridpex