Skip to content
Kaden Feagin

#83Kaden Feagin

TE·Illinois·2025202420230.0 pts line value1st Round

Kaden Feagin is a 3-year Versatile TE for Illinois. Kaden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 124 plays — a developing rate for the TE. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · TEs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.42
    Beats guessing the TE average by 9%. n=2,225 TE seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.04
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=2,016 TE seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.46
    Beats guessing the TE average by 13%. n=2,016 TE seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Kaden Feagin's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2023

4-Star · High major target
Stars
247 composite
0.8958
National rank
#380
High school
Arthur
Hometown
Arthur, IL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2025 Production

Rushing
507 Rush yards7 Rush TD122 Carries4.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
16 Receptions188 Rec yards2 Rec TD11.8 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs TE peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume47
  • Explosiveness32
  • Consistency50
  • Pass-Down100
Player type
Versatile TE

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency50th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs TE peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.10 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.50 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Western Illinois.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · TE · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jaheim BellSouth Carolina0.1100.08.0
Blake BellOklahoma0.0700.14.4
A.J. DoyleMassachusetts0.0400.02.1
Cole GautscheNew Mexico0.1701.017.7
Robby PreckelNorthwestern0.0600.12.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5000.50Wk 1 vs Western Illinois: +0.50 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: -0.04 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Western Michigan: +0.22 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Indiana: -0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs USC: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Purdue: -0.13 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ohio State: +0.23 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Washington: +0.30 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Rutgers: +0.27 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Maryland: +0.18 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wisconsin: -0.05 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Northwestern: +0.09 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsWestern IllinoisW52-30.50
2@DukeW45-196.6-0.04
3vsWestern MichiganW38-0-1.42136.50130.22
4@IndianaL10-6332.4-0.13
5vsUSCW34-3216.936722.3164-0.07
6@PurdueW43-27-6.13206.709-0.13
7vsOhio StateL16-3430.10.23
9@WashingtonL25-4218.4166.0060.30
10vsRutgersW35-131.03268.71100.27
12vsMarylandW24-60.611515.00150.18
13@WisconsinL10-27-4.422512.5019-0.05
14vsNorthwesternW20-135.811616.00160.09
20vsTennesseeW30-2815.0

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
16.6%
Passing plays
4.3%
Rushing plays
28.6%
Standard downs
19.3%
Passing downs
10.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.03
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.71 / -0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.600−0.2220242025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 27 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Illinois
0.0
17.6
2024Illinois
0.0
7.8
2025Illinois
0.0
4.6

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.