Skip to content
Jmariyae Robinson
Jmariyae Robinson

#0Jmariyae Robinson

Jmariyae Robinson is a Versatile WR for Missouri State. Jmariyae's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 63 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jmariyae Robinson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
44 Receptions632 Rec yards7 Rec TD14.4 Yards/rec
Returns
13 Kick returns252 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

12
Targets
5.0y
Avg depth
6.0y
After catch
75%
Catch rate

The ball travels 5.0 yards in the air on an average target 3.9 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.0 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
1
0% · 0y
short
6
83% · 28y
1
100% · 8y
4
75% · 18y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness49
  • Consistency75
  • Pass-Down63
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency75th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 8 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Peak game: 1.88 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs SMU (SP+ 13).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Bert Emanuel Jr.Central Michigan0.4601.624.4

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8801.88Wk 1 vs USC: +0.67 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Marshall: +0.77 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs SMU: +1.88 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs UT Martin: +1.80 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Western Kentucky: -0.27 EPA/play5Wk 9 vs New Mexico State: -0.20 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Florida International: +0.99 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Liberty: +0.34 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs UTEP: +0.76 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Kennesaw State: +0.72 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Louisiana Tech: +1.25 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@USCL13-7316.933010.00180.67
2@MarshallW21-20-4.538528.31520.77
3vsSMUL10-2813.434916.30211.88
4vsUT MartinW42-1022211.00151.80
5vsWestern KentuckyL22-271.622613.0018-0.27
9@New Mexico StateW24-17-15.522211.0014-0.20
10vsFlorida InternationalW28-21-10.56477.82130.99
11@LibertyW21-17-9.056913.81280.34
12vsUTEPW38-24-17.578812.60450.76
13@Kennesaw StateL34-41-5.44328.01100.72
14vsLouisiana TechL30-42-1.336622.01311.25
20vsArkansas StateL28-34-8.849624.0136

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.1%
Passing plays
13.9%
Rushing plays
0.9%
Standard downs
8.1%
Passing downs
8.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.74
Passing downs
0.82
Pass / Rush EPA
0.79 / 0.33

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.