Skip to content
Jai'Den Thomas

#9Jai'Den Thomas

RB·UNLV·2026

Jai'Den Thomas is a Pass-Catching Back for UNLV.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

20%
projected
band 12%'25 22%27%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Jai'Den Thomas's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
224 Rush yards1 Rush TD42 Carries5.3 Yards/carry
Receiving
7 Receptions52 Rec yards0 Rec TD7.4 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns15 KR yards0 KR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

13
Targets
0.9y
Avg depth
6.3y
After catch
54%
Catch rate

The ball travels 0.9 yards in the air on an average target 8.0 yards shorter than the median. Another 6.3 comes after the catch.

Where he is targeted

targets · completion rate · yards
deep
0
0
0
short
2
100% · 15y
2
50% · -2y
9
44% · 39y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume71
  • Explosiveness46
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving98
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.1200.12Wk 1 vs Hawai'i: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs North Texas: -0.12 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
0vsMemphisL21-272.112443.706540
1@Hawai'iW21-6-7.0201437.211-200.06
2@North TexasL6-44-13.210373.70-0.12

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
24.8%
Passing plays
13.4%
Rushing plays
36.3%
Standard downs
26.9%
Passing downs
20.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.09
Passing downs
-0.25
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.13 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.