#14Hahsaun Wilson

RB·Charlotte·2024

Hahsaun Wilson is a Committee Back for Charlotte. Hahsaun's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 72 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Hahsaun Wilson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Rushing

559 Rush yards7 Rush TD91 Carries6.1 Yards/carry

Receiving

4 Receptions42 Rec yards0 Rec TD10.5 Yards/rec

Returns

6 Kick returns76 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume35
Explosiveness62
Consistency20
Receiving17

Player type

Committee Back

Part of a rotation — contributes in a complementary role and keeps the featured back fresh.

Rotational roleSituational use

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency20th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
▸Production faded as the season progressed — 0.12 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
▸Peak game: 0.85 EPA/play in Wk 3 vs Gardner-Webb.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗

Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
1	vsJames Madison	L7-30	7.5	5	35	7.0	0	1	0	0	0.22
2	@North Carolina	L20-38	5.0	8	29	3.6	0	—	—	—	-0.01
3	vsGardner-Webb	W27-26	—	6	52	8.7	1	2	33	0	0.85
4	@Indiana	L14-52	20.1	8	20	2.5	0	—	—	—	-0.28
5	@Rice	W21-20	-11.4	5	7	1.4	1	1	9	0	0.20
6	vsEast Carolina	W55-24	-1.0	15	164	10.9	3	—	—	—	—
8	@Navy	L17-51	3.5	7	29	4.1	0	—	—	—	-0.21
9	@Memphis	L28-33	9.6	4	27	6.8	1	—	—	—	0.47
10	vsTulane	L3-34	5.7	6	68	11.3	0	—	—	—	0.41
12	vsSouth Florida	L24-59	-2.3	7	26	3.7	0	—	—	—	-0.26
13	@Florida Atlantic	W39-27	-12.7	6	18	3.0	0	—	—	—	-0.25
14	vsUAB	W29-27	-11.3	14	84	6.0	1	—	—	—	0.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

12.1%

Passing plays

1.1%

Rushing plays

24.9%

Standard downs

13.1%

Passing downs

10.3%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.17
Passing downs: 0.01
Pass / Rush EPA: 1.03 / 0.07

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).