Skip to content
Grant Hedrick

#9Grant Hedrick

QB·Boise State·20148.9 pts line valueDay 2 (Rds 2–3)

Grant Hedrick is a Dual-Threat QB for Boise State. Grant's 2014 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 557 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Grant Hedrick's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2014 Production

Passing
294/415 Comp/Att3696 Pass yards23 Pass TD14 INT70.8% Comp %
Rushing
592 Rush yards8 Rush TD155 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Punting
2 Punts72 Punt yards36.0 Yards/punt40 Long2 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2014 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat74
  • Consistency76
  • Clutch76
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency76th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 5 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.33 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.89 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Wyoming (SP+ -14).

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3
Kyle McCordSyracuse0.50912.1321.4
Sam HartmanWake Forest0.55611.8359.6
Trace McSorleyPenn State0.51312.7321.0
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8900.89Wk 1 vs Ole Miss: +0.06 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Colorado State: +0.38 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs UConn: +0.29 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Louisiana: +0.13 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Air Force: -0.07 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Nevada: +0.46 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Fresno State: +0.22 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs BYU: +0.86 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs New Mexico: +0.89 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs San Diego State: +0.26 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Wyoming: +0.89 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah State: +0.09 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Fresno State: +0.42 EPA/play15Wk 1 vs Arizona: +0.37 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsOle MissL13-3520.736/462641431.82400.06
2vsColorado StateW37-244.522/333522186.28010.38
3@UConnW38-21-14.119/272332058.6-400.29
4vsLouisianaW34-92.224/312370082.72400.13
5@Air ForceL14-28-1.418/332090417.7400-0.07
6@NevadaW51-46-7.326/313462179.14010.46
8vsFresno StateW37-27-6.921/301901064.25600.22
9vsBYUW55-3010.224/314104195.52910.86
11@New MexicoW60-49-15.021/323674095.913120.89
12vsSan Diego StateW38-291.019/281871270.44110.26
13@WyomingW63-14-14.013/192463090.32200.89
14vsUtah StateW50-196.018/241912075.6-100.09
15vsFresno StateW28-14-6.99/161550092.78120.42
1vsArizonaW38-307.624/343091168.02900.37

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
52.8%
Passing plays
92.4%
Rushing plays
22.3%
Standard downs
46.0%
Passing downs
68.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.29
Passing downs
0.47
Pass / Rush EPA
0.39 / 0.27

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.16
EPA per play · 2014 · 14 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.