Skip to content
General Booty

#14General Booty

General Booty is a Clutch Passer for UL Monroe. General's 2024 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 61 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So General Booty's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
29/54 Comp/Att306 Pass yards2 Pass TD2 INT53.7% Comp %
Rushing
16 Rush yards0 Rush TD11 Carries1.5 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume68
  • Dual-Threat16
  • Consistency19
  • Clutch81
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency19th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 5.24 EPA/play in Wk 12 vs Auburn (SP+ 10).

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+5.2405.24Wk 1 vs Jackson State: +0.15 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UAB: +0.10 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs Texas: -0.29 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Troy: -1.05 EPA/play5Wk 12 vs Auburn: +5.24 EPA/play12
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsJackson StateW30-1410/141041018.82200.15
2vsUABW32-6-11.39/16870040.0200.10
4@TexasL3-5124.18/1942016.5-80-0.29
5@TroyW13-9-6.61/48011.5-1.05
12@AuburnL14-489.51/16510100.05.24

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
23.9%
Passing plays
64.0%
Rushing plays
3.9%
Standard downs
18.6%
Passing downs
34.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.18
Passing downs
0.02
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.09 / -0.02

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.