Skip to content
Dequan Finn

#1Dequan Finn

QB·Toledo·202320227.9 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Dequan Finn is a 2-year Dual-Threat QB for Toledo. Dequan's 2023 season ranks in the 53th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 418 plays — a average rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Dequan Finn's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Passing
201/317 Comp/Att2651 Pass yards22 Pass TD9 INT63.4% Comp %
Rushing
563 Rush yards7 Rush TD123 Carries4.6 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency53
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat84
  • Consistency81
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)53th %ile · average
Game-to-game consistency81th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.15 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Eastern Michigan (SP+ -12).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Stetson BennettGeorgia0.63512.5323.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1501.15Wk 1 vs Illinois: +0.35 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Texas Southern: +0.95 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs San José State: +0.10 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Western Michigan: +0.77 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Northern Illinois: +0.92 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Massachusetts: +0.83 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Ball State: +0.32 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Miami (OH): +0.32 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Buffalo: +0.41 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Eastern Michigan: +1.15 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Bowling Green: +0.33 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Central Michigan: +0.11 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Miami (OH): +0.22 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@IllinoisL28-30-2.520/362302168.17510.35
2vsTexas SouthernW71-316/172323056.6700.95
3vsSan José StateW21-17-3.413/23921148.06210.10
4vsWestern MichiganW49-31-15.98/141192234.63600.77
5vsNorthern IllinoisW35-33-7.516/202812095.26110.92
6@MassachusettsW41-24-17.515/231392194.917210.83
7@Ball StateW13-6-14.915/271660054.32500.32
8@Miami (OH)W21-172.816/281602064.53410.32
10vsBuffaloW31-13-15.212/191761134.21700.41
11vsEastern MichiganW49-23-12.323/274073199.51001.15
12@Bowling GreenW32-31-7.820/302792158.1710.33
13@Central MichiganW32-17-19.19/17971022.02400.11
14vsMiami (OH)L14-232.818/362731146.63310.22

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
50.9%
Passing plays
90.1%
Rushing plays
24.6%
Standard downs
43.6%
Passing downs
67.2%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.31
Passing downs
0.65
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / 0.32

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.290−0.462023
EPA per play · 2022 — 2023 · 25 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2022Toledo
6.7
205.8
2023Toledo
7.9
234.3

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.