Skip to content
Daniel Hill

#4Daniel Hill

Daniel Hill is a Explosive Back for Alabama. Daniel's 2026 season produced 10.1 total EPA across 30 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

14%
projected
band 7%'25 13%21%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daniel Hill's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
151 Rush yards3 Rush TD27 Carries5.6 Yards/carry
Receiving
4 Receptions22 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.5 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency98
  • Volume60
  • Explosiveness52
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving46
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)98th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among RBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Peak game: 0.40 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs East Carolina (SP+ -8).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4000.40Wk 1 vs East Carolina: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Kentucky: +0.31 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsEast CarolinaW48-10-8.19475.2221000.40
2@KentuckyW45-178.5181045.8121200.31

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
21.0%
Passing plays
5.3%
Rushing plays
32.1%
Standard downs
23.9%
Passing downs
11.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.41
Passing downs
-0.15
Pass / Rush EPA
0.34 / 0.34

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.