Skip to content
Daniel Hill

#4Daniel Hill

Daniel Hill is a Pass-Catching Back for Alabama. Daniel's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 107 plays — a developing rate for the RB.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Daniel Hill's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing
284 Rush yards6 Rush TD75 Carries3.8 Yards/carry
Receiving
28 Receptions203 Rec yards1 Rec TD7.3 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume39
  • Explosiveness16
  • Consistency37
  • Receiving100
Player type
Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency37th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • 3 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.15 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 1.31 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Eastern Illinois.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.3101.31Wk 1 vs Florida State: -0.01 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs UL Monroe: +0.03 EPA/play2Wk 7 vs Missouri: +0.11 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Tennessee: +0.45 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs South Carolina: +0.82 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs LSU: -0.35 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Oklahoma: +0.36 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Eastern Illinois: +1.31 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Auburn: -0.18 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Georgia: -0.20 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@Florida StateL17-317.2393.002120-0.01
2vsUL MonroeW73-0-21.63144.700.03
7@MissouriW27-2414.46162.701110.11
8vsTennesseeW37-2015.07344.9111600.45
9@South CarolinaW29-225.93103.3047600.82
11vsLSUW20-910.37213.011-30-0.35
12vsOklahomaL21-2318.315604.0253700.36
13vsEastern IllinoisW56-02147.011.31
14@AuburnW27-2011.611393.50290-0.18
15vsGeorgiaL7-2824.14112.805500-0.20
20vsIndianaL3-3832.45132.60750
20@OklahomaW34-2418.39434.81

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.7%
Passing plays
7.6%
Rushing plays
22.0%
Standard downs
15.7%
Passing downs
8.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.03
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.28 / 0.03

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.