Skip to content
Cutter Woods

#12Cutter Woods

Cutter Woods is a Dual-Threat QB for South Carolina.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cutter Woods's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
8/11 Comp/Att69 Pass yards0 Pass TD1 INT72.7% Comp %
Rushing
18 Rush yards0 Rush TD3 Carries6.0 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume33
  • Dual-Threat98
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.1000.10Wk 8 vs Oklahoma: -0.08 EPA/play8Wk 13 vs Coastal Carolina: +0.04 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
8vsOklahomaL7-2618.34/6460173.2130-0.08
13vsCoastal CarolinaW51-7-15.14/5230061.1500.04

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
11.4%
Passing plays
18.6%
Rushing plays
4.5%
Standard downs
11.3%
Passing downs
11.6%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.15
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.23 / 0.39

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.