Skip to content
Curtis Kimmons IV
Curtis Kimmons IV

#14Curtis Kimmons IV

Curtis Kimmons IV is a Explosive Back for Massachusetts.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Curtis Kimmons IV's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
89 Rush yards1 Rush TD14 Carries6.4 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions10 Rec yards0 Rec TD5.0 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency68
  • Volume43
  • Explosiveness68
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving65
Player type
Explosive Back

Elite per-carry efficiency — breaks big runs and creates chunk plays at a top rate while in a limited role.

Big-play threatHigh EPA per carryCapitalises on opportunities
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)68th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Peak game: 0.41 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Rutgers (SP+ -4).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.4100.41Wk 1 vs Rutgers: +0.41 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Sacred Heart: -0.18 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1@RutgersW37-21-3.611787.111900.41
2vsSacred HeartW37-103113.70110-0.18

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
15.2%
Passing plays
5.4%
Rushing plays
21.2%
Standard downs
16.7%
Passing downs
11.1%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.35
Passing downs
-0.20
Pass / Rush EPA
0.08 / 0.26

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Curtis Kimmons Iv Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Massachusetts · Gridpex