Skip to content
Carson Beck

#11Carson Beck

QB·Georgia·2025202420236.8 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Carson Beck is a 3-year Clutch Passer for Georgia. Carson's 2024 season ranks in the 33th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 496 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Production has trended downward season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Carson Beck's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2024 Production

Passing
290/448 Comp/Att3485 Pass yards28 Pass TD12 INT64.7% Comp %
Rushing
71 Rush yards1 Rush TD55 Carries1.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2024 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency33
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat46
  • Consistency74
  • Clutch100
Player type
Clutch Passer

Elevates on passing downs — 3rd-and-medium, two-minute drills, and pressure situations are where this QB is best.

3rd-down precisionLate-game valueHigh passing-down EPA
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)33th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency74th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↓ Declining
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Production has slipped season-over-season on adjusted value metrics.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 7 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.23 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 0.72 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Tennessee Tech.

NIL Market Tier· 2024

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · QB · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Jordan TravisFlorida State0.47610.1328.3

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.7200.72Wk 1 vs Clemson: +0.52 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tennessee Tech: +0.72 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kentucky: +0.28 EPA/play3Wk 5 vs Alabama: +0.25 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Auburn: +0.52 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Mississippi State: +0.56 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Texas: -0.11 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Florida: +0.20 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Ole Miss: -0.20 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Tennessee: +0.69 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Massachusetts: +0.42 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Georgia Tech: +0.44 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Texas: -0.06 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsClemsonW34-313.323/332782091.71900.52
2vsTennessee TechW48-318/252425083.01800.72
3@KentuckyW13-125.515/241600069.81800.28
5@AlabamaL34-4125.027/504393370.1900.25
6vsAuburnW31-139.523/292402089.2-1500.52
7vsMississippi StateW41-31-4.136/484593275.1800.56
8@TexasW30-1524.123/411750364.380-0.11
10vsFloridaW34-2013.825/403092361.0-600.20
11@Ole MissL10-2827.920/311860155.9-200-0.20
12vsTennesseeW31-1722.025/403472098.03210.69
13vsMassachusettsW59-21-21.920/312974090.7500.42
14vsGeorgia TechW44-421.928/432975082.21000.44
15vsTexasW22-1924.17/13560059.4-150-0.06

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
57.0%
Passing plays
92.9%
Rushing plays
11.9%
Standard downs
50.9%
Passing downs
72.8%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.22
Passing downs
0.54
Pass / Rush EPA
0.35 / 0.13

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+0.990−0.3020242025
EPA per play · 2023 — 2025 · 43 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2023Georgia
10.6
283.3
2024Georgia
6.8
225.6
2025Miami
6.5
203.8

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.