Skip to content
Cam Pickett

#7Cam Pickett

Cam Pickett is a Slot Specialist WR for Kansas. Cam's 2025 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 63 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cam Pickett's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Receiving
45 Receptions449 Rec yards3 Rec TD10.0 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns38 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume23
  • Explosiveness20
  • Consistency66
  • Pass-Down71
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • 6 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.42 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.86 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Wagner.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Savion WilliamsTCU0.4501.125.2
Keytaon ThompsonMississippi State0.4601.232.2
DeAndre HughesAir Force0.4701.328.2
Quadree HendersonPittsburgh0.5301.633.4
Dane KinamonAir Force0.4100.716.0

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.8601.86Wk 1 vs Wagner: +1.86 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Missouri: +1.41 EPA/play2Wk 4 vs West Virginia: -0.39 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Cincinnati: +0.51 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs UCF: +0.72 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs Texas Tech: +0.81 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Kansas State: +0.32 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Oklahoma State: +0.08 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs Arizona: +1.26 EPA/play11Wk 13 vs Iowa State: +0.07 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Utah: -0.14 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
0vsFresno StateW31-71.867712.8221
1vsWagnerW46-722914.51201.86
2@MissouriL31-4214.42189.00121.41
4vsWest VirginiaW41-10-6.8188.008-0.39
5vsCincinnatiL34-374.523115.50270.51
6@UCFW27-20-1.256412.80380.72
7@Texas TechL17-4227.66559.20190.81
9vsKansas StateL17-427.06406.70140.32
10vsOklahoma StateW38-21-15.13124.0090.08
11@ArizonaL20-2412.036220.70261.26
13@Iowa StateL14-389.94225.50110.07
14vsUtahL21-3122.25316.2025-0.14

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
8.0%
Passing plays
17.1%
Rushing plays
0.5%
Standard downs
6.2%
Passing downs
13.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.46
Passing downs
0.59
Pass / Rush EPA
0.51 / 0.58

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Cam Pickett Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Kansas · Gridpex