Skip to content
Cale Hellums

#3Cale Hellums

QB·Army·2026

Cale Hellums is a Dual-Threat QB for Army. Cale's 2026 season produced 14.4 total EPA across 43 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

40%
projected
band 22%'25 43%58%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Cale Hellums's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
13/19 Comp/Att150 Pass yards2 Pass TD0 INT68.4% Comp %
Rushing
142 Rush yards2 Rush TD25 Carries5.7 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume90
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch81
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.54 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs Bryant.

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Star

Top-10 nationally. Multiple mid-to-large collective deals expected.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.5400.54Wk 1 vs Bryant: +0.54 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs South Florida: +0.21 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsBryantW59-34/959008720.54
2vsSouth FloridaL24-28-3.19/1091205500.21

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
31.6%
Passing plays
79.2%
Rushing plays
22.2%
Standard downs
27.3%
Passing downs
50.0%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.27
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.23 / 0.42

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.