Skip to content
Caden Creel

#12Caden Creel

Caden Creel is a Dual-Threat QB for Jacksonville State. Caden's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 366 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Caden Creel's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
130/211 Comp/Att1514 Pass yards9 Pass TD4 INT61.6% Comp %
Rushing
1075 Rush yards7 Rush TD182 Carries5.9 Yards/carry
Returns
1 Punt returns4 PR yards0 PR TD

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

46
Attempts
9.2y
Avg depth
5.7y
After catch
65%
Catch rate

The ball travels 9.2 yards in the air on an average throw 1.4 yards deeper than the median. Another 5.7 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
2
0% · 0y
1
0% · 0y
4
50% · 61y
short
16
63% · 95y
13
85% · 115y
10
70% · 69y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat81
  • Consistency66
  • Clutch73
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency66th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 0.84 EPA/play in Wk 4 vs Murray State.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.8400.84Wk 1 vs UCF: +0.32 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Liberty: -0.26 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Georgia Southern: +0.04 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Murray State: +0.84 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Southern Miss: +0.12 EPA/play5Wk 7 vs Sam Houston: +0.35 EPA/play7Wk 8 vs Delaware: +0.09 EPA/play8Wk 10 vs Middle Tennessee: -0.00 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs UTEP: +0.23 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Kennesaw State: +0.68 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida International: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Western Kentucky: +0.39 EPA/play14Wk 15 vs Kennesaw State: +0.26 EPA/play15
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@UCFL10-17-1.21/1180099.31400.32
2vsLibertyW34-24-9.030-0.26
3@Georgia SouthernL34-41-9.41300.04
4vsMurray StateW45-102/2140098.45810.84
5@Southern MissL25-42-7.19/171091259.216110.12
7vsSam HoustonW29-27-27.813/171290041.213210.35
8vsDelawareW38-25-10.914/211161031.75700.09
10@Middle TennesseeW24-21-16.013/191391018.7310-0.00
11@UTEPW30-27-17.515/311811173.913400.23
12vsKennesaw StateW35-26-5.48/131370089.312720.68
13@Florida InternationalL21-27-10.517/301982039.710000.12
14vsWestern KentuckyW37-341.612/192042066.014310.39
15vsKennesaw StateL15-19-5.412/21960153.411210.26
20vsTroyW17-13-4.814/201731030.1-100

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.7%
Passing plays
65.7%
Rushing plays
25.9%
Standard downs
35.8%
Passing downs
49.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.16
Passing downs
0.32
Pass / Rush EPA
0.18 / 0.30

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.
Caden Creel Stats, EPA & Player Profile — Jacksonville State · Gridpex