Skip to content
Ca'Lil Valentine
Ca'Lil Valentine

#5Ca'Lil Valentine

Ca'Lil Valentine is a Featured Back for Illinois. Ca'Lil's 2026 season produced 5.4 total EPA across 30 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

17%
projected
band 10%'25 18%24%

Regressed toward the RB mean. Model correlation r≈0.52 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.52
    Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.41
    Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ca'Lil Valentine's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Rushing
144 Rush yards1 Rush TD29 Carries5.0 Yards/carry
Receiving
2 Receptions13 Rec yards0 Rec TD6.5 Yards/rec
Returns
1 Kick returns31 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs RB peers

  • Efficiency15
  • Volume75
  • Explosiveness40
  • Consistency50
  • Receiving26
Player type
Featured Back

The centerpiece of the run game — high carry volume, used in early downs and goal-line, true workhorse role.

Primary ball carrierHigh volumeGoal-line threat
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)15th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Peak game: 0.38 EPA/play in Wk 1 vs UAB (SP+ -16).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.3800.38Wk 1 vs UAB: +0.38 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Duke: +0.05 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+CarRush YdsAvgRush TDRecRec YdsRec TDEPA/play
1vsUABW42-23-16.011888.011400.38
2vsDukeL27-316.618563.101900.05

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
26.3%
Passing plays
3.8%
Rushing plays
48.3%
Standard downs
30.7%
Passing downs
11.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.20
Passing downs
-0.06
Pass / Rush EPA
0.38 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.