Skip to content
C.J. Carr

C.J. Carr

C.J. Carr is a Efficient Passer for Notre Dame. C.J.'s 2026 season produced 26.3 total EPA across 48 plays.

2026 Usage Outlook · projected share of team plays

40%
projected
band 22%'25 42%58%

Regressed toward the QB mean. Model correlation r≈0.46 on a 2019-2025 walk-forward — volume only; efficiency not projected.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So C.J. Carr's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2026 Production

Passing
35/49 Comp/Att492 Pass yards6 Pass TD0 INT71.4% Comp %
Rushing
-6 Rush yards0 Rush TD2 Carries-3.0 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

49
Attempts
8.2y
Avg depth
6.2y
After catch
71%
Catch rate

The ball travels 8.2 yards in the air on an average throw about the median for the position. Another 6.2 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
6
50% · 104y
0
3
67% · 59y
short
15
80% · 150y
9
78% · 91y
16
69% · 88y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2026 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency95
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat0
  • Consistency50
  • Clutch0
Player type
Efficient Passer

Maximises EPA per play through accuracy, decision-making, and getting the ball to the right place.

Elite EPA per playLow-turnover profileDecision-making
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)95th %ile · elite
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Peak game: 0.95 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Rice (SP+ -10).

NIL Market Tier· 2026

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9500.95Wk 1 vs Wisconsin: +0.40 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Rice: +0.95 EPA/play2
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsWisconsinW41-13-1.519/292392081.3-600.40
2vsRiceW52-0-10.416/202534095.70.95

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
39.2%
Passing plays
79.0%
Rushing plays
3.2%
Standard downs
41.0%
Passing downs
33.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.59
Passing downs
0.36
Pass / Rush EPA
0.58 / -0.24

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.