Skip to content
Braxton Woodson

#5Braxton Woodson

QB·Navy·2025

Braxton Woodson is a Dual-Threat QB for Navy. Braxton's 2025 season ranks in the 90th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 62 plays — a elite rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Braxton Woodson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
9/19 Comp/Att110 Pass yards0 Pass TD0 INT47.4% Comp %
Rushing
414 Rush yards6 Rush TD44 Carries9.4 Yards/carry

Air yards

Where the ball goes, and how much of the gain is the throw rather than the run after it.

16
Attempts
10.2y
Avg depth
1.8y
After catch
38%
Catch rate

The ball travels 10.2 yards in the air on an average throw 1.7 yards deeper than the median. Another 1.8 comes after the catch.

Where he throws

attempts · completion rate · yards
deep
1
0% · 0y
1
100% · 27y
0
short
2
50% · 10y
3
33% · 12y
9
33% · 19y
leftmiddleright

Depth and direction come from CFBD’s passing detail, which is backfilled after the games: this covers weeks 1–2 only. Spikes, throwaways and intentional grounding are excluded before any average.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency90
  • Volume38
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency72
  • Clutch49
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)90th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency72th %ile · average
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among QBs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.39 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 2.26 EPA/play in Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic (SP+ -9).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.2602.26Wk 1 vs VMI: +1.20 EPA/play1Wk 3 vs Tulsa: -0.08 EPA/play3Wk 9 vs Florida Atlantic: +2.26 EPA/play9Wk 11 vs Notre Dame: +0.14 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs South Florida: +0.82 EPA/play12Wk 16 vs Army: +0.65 EPA/play16
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsVMIW52-73/7260099.918021.20
3@TulsaW42-23-10.0140-0.08
9vsFlorida AtlanticW42-32-8.71/12300100.01612.26
11@Notre DameL10-4924.43/8220056.610110.14
12vsSouth FloridaW41-3811.62/3390099.910320.82
16vsArmyW17-160.80.65
20vsCincinnatiW35-134.500

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
13.4%
Passing plays
21.4%
Rushing plays
11.6%
Standard downs
11.0%
Passing downs
20.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.44
Passing downs
0.48
Pass / Rush EPA
0.16 / 0.61

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.