Skip to content
Bo Nix

#10Bo Nix

QB·Auburn·20232022202020195.6 pts line valueDay 3 (Rds 4–7)

Bo Nix is a 4-year Dual-Threat QB for Auburn. Bo's 2019 season ranks in the 18th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 463 plays — a developing rate for the QB. Bo's production has improved each season, a positive development trajectory.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Bo Nix's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Recruiting Profile· Class of 2019

5-Star · Blue chip
Stars
247 composite
0.9856
National rank
#33
High school
Pinson Valley
Hometown
Pinson, AL

Recruiting data from CFBD/247Sports composite. Sourced from the player's signing-class team — transfers show original school's class.

2019 Production

Passing
217/377 Comp/Att2542 Pass yards16 Pass TD6 INT57.6% Comp %
Rushing
313 Rush yards7 Rush TD97 Carries3.2 Yards/carry
Punting
3 Punts112 Punt yards37.3 Yards/punt42 Long1 Inside 20

Performance Analysis · 2019 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency18
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat70
  • Consistency70
  • Clutch94
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)18th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency70th %ile · average
Career trajectory:↑ Rising
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • Career trajectory is upward — WEPA value has improved season over season.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Peak game: 1.12 EPA/play in Wk 5 vs Mississippi State (SP+ 4).

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.1201.12Wk 1 vs Oregon: +0.02 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Tulane: +0.37 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Kent State: +0.38 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Texas A&M: +0.22 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Mississippi State: +1.12 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Florida: -0.19 EPA/play6Wk 8 vs Arkansas: +0.67 EPA/play8Wk 9 vs LSU: +0.09 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Ole Miss: +0.28 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Georgia: +0.12 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Samford: +0.27 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs Alabama: +0.37 EPA/play14Wk 1 vs Minnesota: +0.32 EPA/play1
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1vsOregonW27-2119.013/311772244.84200.02
2vsTulaneW24-67.519/372071067.61600.37
3vsKent StateW55-16-10.212/161611082.52110.38
4@Texas A&MW28-2015.012/201001040.63800.22
5vsMississippi StateW56-233.516/213352099.25611.12
6@FloridaL13-2424.011/27145136.6180-0.19
8@ArkansasW51-10-10.612/171763082.71910.67
9@LSUL20-2333.115/351571127.6-1610.09
10vsOle MissW20-142.930/44340002010.28
12vsGeorgiaL14-2126.830/50245104210.12
13vsSamfordW52-015/2315010100.27
14vsAlabamaW48-4532.415/30173104410.37
1vsMinnesotaL24-3119.417/26176101200.32

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
49.5%
Passing plays
95.4%
Rushing plays
15.8%
Standard downs
41.3%
Passing downs
68.5%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.14
Passing downs
0.41
Pass / Rush EPA
0.25 / 0.25

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.250−0.32202020222023
EPA per play · 2019 — 2023 · 51 games
SeasonTeamLine valueTotal EPA
2019Auburn
5.6
200.8
2020Auburn
3.8
178.5
2022Oregon
11.2
278.6
2023Oregon
16.7
390.0

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.