#22Anthony Frias II

RB·UCLA·2025

Anthony Frias II is a Pass-Catching Back for UCLA. Anthony's 2025 season produced 1.5 total EPA across 31 plays.

What projects, and what doesn't · RBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

Usage share (volume)0.52
Beats guessing the RB average by 18%. n=4,219 RB seasons
EPA per play (efficiency)0.10
Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=3,575 RB seasons
Total EPA (value)0.41
Beats guessing the RB average by 9%. n=3,575 RB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Anthony Frias II's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Rushing

183 Rush yards1 Rush TD24 Carries7.6 Yards/carry

Receiving

13 Receptions78 Rec yards1 Rec TD6.0 Yards/rec

Returns

10 Kick returns179 KR yards0 KR TD

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs RB peers

Efficiency0
Volume22
Explosiveness92
Consistency27
Receiving100

Player type

Pass-Catching Back

Third-down weapon out of the backfield. Routes, hands, and separation in coverage define this role as much as rushing.

3rd-down backReceiving threatPass protection

Peer percentiles

Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg

Game-to-game consistency27th %ile · below avg

Key findings

▸Below-average efficiency vs RB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
▸Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
▸High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
▸Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.32 from the first to second half of the season.
▸Peak game: 2.42 EPA/play in Wk 11 vs Nebraska (SP+ 6).

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗

Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost

Wk	Opponent	Result	Opp SP+	Car	Rush Yds	Avg	Rush TD	Rec	Rec Yds	Rec TD	EPA/play
2	@UNLV	L23-30	4.3	—	—	—	—	1	5	0	0.11
3	vsNew Mexico	L10-35	0.9	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
5	@Northwestern	L14-17	5.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
6	vsPenn State	W42-37	18.1	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
7	@Michigan State	W38-13	-3.4	7	37	5.3	0	1	5	0	0.00
8	vsMaryland	W20-17	0.6	4	97	24.3	1	1	2	0	1.03
9	@Indiana	L6-56	32.4	6	31	5.2	0	2	9	0	0.15
11	vsNebraska	L21-28	6.2	—	—	—	—	1	9	1	2.42
12	@Ohio State	L10-48	30.1	2	5	2.5	0	2	29	0	0.36
13	vsWashington	L14-48	18.4	2	5	2.5	0	4	21	0	-0.24
14	@USC	L10-29	16.9	3	8	2.7	0	1	-2	0	-0.82

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy

Overall

7.8%

Passing plays

5.9%

Rushing plays

10.4%

Standard downs

8.4%

Passing downs

6.7%

EPA by down type

Standard downs: 0.07
Passing downs: -0.03
Pass / Rush EPA: -0.02 / 0.08

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).