Skip to content
Utah Hockey Club at Oilers
NHL

Utah Mammoth at Edmonton Oilers

FinalTV Utah16, SN·Rogers Place

Recap

written from the game data

The Edmonton Oilers beat the Utah Mammoth 4-1. The Oilers scored first and never trailed. The Oilers led 3-1 after two periods. The biggest swing in win probability was Ryan Nugent-Hopkins's goal at 4:53 of the second period, which took the Oilers' chances from 53% to 70%. Expected goals favored the Oilers, 3.9 to 2.3; shots on goal were UTA 27, EDM 38. With league-average goaltending at both ends, the Oilers win a replay of these chances 63% of the time. Jaxson Stauber stopped 34 of 37 (.919); Stuart Skinner stopped 26 of 27 (.963), 1.3 goals saved above expected. Three stars: 1. Connor Brown (2 A), 2. Stuart Skinner (26 saves, .963), 3. Mattias Ekholm (1 G, 1 A).

Three stars

  1. ★
    EDM
    C. Brown2 A
  2. ★★
    EDM
    S. Skinner26 saves, .963
  3. ★★★
    EDM
    M. Ekholm1 G, 1 A

Line score

goals · shots on goal beneath
Goals and shots on goal by period
Team1st2nd3rdT
UTAUTA11106010127
EDMEDM11521716438

Scoring

5 goals

1st period

  1. EDM
    slapxG 0.10win prob +12 ptsVideo
    0-1
    4:26
  2. UTA
    snapxG 0.17win prob +12 ptsVideo
    1-1
    6:00

2nd period

  1. EDM
    C. McDavid (38), C. Brown (11)
    wristxG 0.09win prob +17 ptsVideo
    1-2
    4:53
  2. EDM
    C. Brown (12), C. McDavid (39)
    snapxG 0.05win prob +15 ptsVideo
    1-3
    5:13

3rd period

  1. EDM
    wristxG 0.90Video
    1-4
    18:58

Penalties

UTA 8 PIM·EDM 6 PIM

2nd

  • 8:25UTAJack McBain · Trippingdrawn by Connor McDavid2 min
  • 11:41EDMTroy Stecher · Trippingdrawn by Nick Schmaltz2 min
  • 20:00UTALiam O'Brien · Roughingdrawn by Jeff Skinner2 min
  • 20:00EDMJeff Skinner · Roughingdrawn by Liam O'Brien2 min

3rd

  • 6:34EDMZach Hyman · Holding the stickdrawn by Alexander Kerfoot2 min
  • 9:19UTAIan Cole · Holdingdrawn by Zach Hyman2 min
  • 19:41UTAMichael Carcone · Trippingdrawn by Brett Kulak2 min

Win probability

ours · the whole game
Tap or hover the chart for the moment-by-moment number
EDM goalUTA goalFinal: EDM 100%

Biggest swing: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, 2nd 4:53 — EDM 53% → 70%

Shot map

unblocked attempts · size = our xG
L. Draisaitl · Goal · xG 0.90V. Podkolzin · On goal · xG 0.24A. Henrique · Missed · xG 0.20C. McDavid · Missed · xG 0.17M. Janmark · On goal · xG 0.16L. Draisaitl · Missed · xG 0.14V. Podkolzin · Missed · xG 0.12Z. Hyman · On goal · xG 0.12C. McDavid · Missed · xG 0.12L. Draisaitl · On goal · xG 0.11V. Arvidsson · On goal · xG 0.10C. McDavid · Missed · xG 0.10M. Ekholm · Goal · xG 0.10C. McDavid · On goal · xG 0.09R. Nugent-Hopkins · Goal · xG 0.09Z. Hyman · On goal · xG 0.09V. Podkolzin · On goal · xG 0.08R. Nugent-Hopkins · On goal · xG 0.08C. McDavid · On goal · xG 0.08V. Podkolzin · On goal · xG 0.07V. Arvidsson · On goal · xG 0.07R. Nugent-Hopkins · On goal · xG 0.07L. Draisaitl · Missed · xG 0.06E. Bouchard · Missed · xG 0.06V. Arvidsson · On goal · xG 0.05T. Stecher · Goal · xG 0.05E. Bouchard · On goal · xG 0.03E. Bouchard · Missed · xG 0.03K. Kapanen · On goal · xG 0.03D. Nurse · On goal · xG 0.03A. Henrique · Missed · xG 0.03A. Henrique · On goal · xG 0.03B. Kulak · On goal · xG 0.03E. Bouchard · On goal · xG 0.03Z. Hyman · Missed · xG 0.02J. Skinner · On goal · xG 0.02B. Kulak · On goal · xG 0.02B. Kulak · On goal · xG 0.02T. Emberson · Missed · xG 0.02M. Janmark · On goal · xG 0.01E. Bouchard · On goal · xG 0.01M. Ekholm · On goal · xG 0.01D. Nurse · On goal · xG 0.01Z. Hyman · On goal · xG 0.01D. Nurse · On goal · xG 0.01B. Kulak · On goal · xG 0.01T. Emberson · On goal · xG 0.01D. Nurse · On goal · xG 0.00T. Stecher · On goal · xG 0.00M. Janmark · On goal · xG 0.00
EDM4 G · 3.9 xG · 50 att
Tap a shot for who, when and how likely
GoalOn goalMissedBigger = higher xG

Expected goals

UTAvsEDM
2.31 G
All situations
3 G3.9
1.51 G
Even strength
3 G2.3
0.80 G
Power play
0 G0.6
0.00 G
Shorthanded
0 G0.2

Expected goals: the chance each unblocked attempt scores, from our shot model, summed. 93 unblocked attempts. Empty-net goals are left out of the goal counts.

Deserve to win

on the chances created
UTA37%63%EDM

Flurry-adjusted xG 2.25 – 3.00

How often each side wins a replay of these chances with league-average goaltending at both ends. Rebounds in a flurry are counted once, so a scramble is not three chances.

Team stats

UTAvsEDM
27
Shots on goal
38
46%
Faceoffs
54%
0/2
Power play
0/3
8
Penalty minutes
6
15
Hits
4
14
Blocked shots
12
26
Giveaways
13
3
Takeaways
7

Box score

every player line
Utah Mammoth skaters
SkaterGAP+/-SOGixGHitBlkPIMFO%TOI
98M. SergachevD000-220.17020—24:08
2O. MaattaD000-100.02110—22:10
28I. ColeD000010.03042—22:04
7M. KesselringD000030.07000—20:12
8N. SchmaltzC000-210.05000018:41
92L. CooleyC011-120.240003318:40
27B. HaytonC000-200.000206218:20
15A. KerfootC000-220.07010017:19
11D. GuentherR011-120.16100—16:46
4J. VälimäkiD000-120.02020—15:50
67L. CrouseL000000.03200—15:11
82K. StenlundC000-110.090003813:51
22J. McBainC101020.352025013:50
63M. MaccelliL000-130.27000—13:36
17N. BjugstadC000020.280106013:29
53M. CarconeL000-120.12202—11:27
52V. KolyachonokD000-100.00110—10:18
38L. O'BrienC000020.35602009:13
Utah Mammoth goalies
GoalieSASVGASV%xGAGSAxTOI
33J. Stauber(L)37343.9193.04+0.0458:36

Season series

EDM leads 3-0

Data: NHL. Model: Gridpex (expected goals and win probability built on NHL play-by-play).