NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
SF% against xGF/6032 clubs
Utah Mammoth are near the top of both: 2nd in expected goals for per 60 (5-on-5) (2.59) and 1st in shot share (65.6%). 10 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two move together closely (r = 0.54).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | xGF/60 | SF% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.59#2 | 65.6%#1 | |
| 2 | 2.56#5 | 60.7%#2 | |
| 3 | 2.58#3 | 57.5%#7 | |
| 4 | 2.69#1 | 53.3%#11 | |
| 5 | 2.55#8 | 58.7%#5 | |
| 6 | 2.55#10 | 58.9%#4 | |
| 7 | 2.55#11 | 59.3%#3 | |
| 8 | 2.55#6 | 54.0%#10 | |
| 9 | 2.51#13 | 58.7%#6 | |
| 10 | 2.47#16 | 56.1%#8 | |
| 11 | 2.55#9 | 50.0%#18 | |
| 12 | 2.46#19 | 55.0%#9 | |
| 13 | 2.57#4 | 40.0%#30 | |
| 14 | 2.55#7 | 43.2%#28 | |
| 15 | 2.48#15 | 48.4%#20 | |
| 16 | 2.44#23 | 52.4%#12 | |
| 17 | 2.45#21 | 50.9%#16 | |
| 18 | 2.44#24 | 51.2%#14 | |
| 19 | 2.43#25 | 52.4%#13 | |
| 20 | 2.48#14 | 45.0%#25 | |
| 21 | 2.47#18 | 47.9%#22 | |
| 22 | 2.51#12 | 41.8%#29 | |
| 23 | 2.47#17 | 45.8%#24 | |
| 24 | 2.45#22 | 49.5%#19 | |
| 25 | 2.42#26 | 51.0%#15 | |
| 26 | 2.41#27 | 50.4%#17 | |
| 27 | 2.46#20 | 43.4%#27 | |
| 28 | 2.37#30 | 48.3%#21 | |
| 29 | 2.39#29 | 45.8%#23 | |
| 30 | 2.39#28 | 43.6%#26 | |
| 31 | 2.34#31 | 36.6%#31 | |
| 32 | 2.34#32 | 33.7%#32 |
What the two axes are
Expected goals for per 60 (5-on-5). Expected goals created per 60 minutes of five-on-five play: how many goals an average finisher would score on these chances.
Shot share. The club's share of all shots on goal in its games, all situations.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
