NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
SH% against xGF/6032 clubs
Colorado Avalanche are near the top of both: 1st in expected goals for per 60 (5-on-5) (2.69) and 2nd in shooting % (21.5%). 11 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two move together loosely (r = 0.35).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | xGF/60 | SH% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.69#1 | 21.5%#2 | |
| 2 | 2.57#4 | 20.0%#3 | |
| 3 | 2.56#5 | 19.1%#4 | |
| 4 | 2.59#2 | 15.9%#8 | |
| 5 | 2.55#10 | 18.3%#5 | |
| 6 | 2.51#12 | 17.1%#6 | |
| 7 | 2.55#7 | 12.5%#12 | |
| 8 | 2.55#8 | 13.0%#11 | |
| 9 | 2.47#17 | 16.3%#7 | |
| 10 | 2.55#11 | 11.9%#14 | |
| 11 | 2.55#9 | 10.3%#17 | |
| 12 | 2.39#28 | 23.9%#1 | |
| 13 | 2.55#6 | 7.4%#24 | |
| 14 | 2.48#15 | 11.9%#15 | |
| 15 | 2.58#3 | 5.7%#28 | |
| 16 | 2.48#14 | 10.0%#18 | |
| 17 | 2.47#16 | 11.7%#16 | |
| 18 | 2.46#19 | 12.1%#13 | |
| 19 | 2.42#26 | 13.5%#10 | |
| 20 | 2.47#18 | 10.0%#20 | |
| 21 | 2.37#30 | 15.8%#9 | |
| 22 | 2.51#13 | 3.7%#30 | |
| 23 | 2.45#22 | 8.7%#23 | |
| 24 | 2.46#20 | 6.5%#26 | |
| 25 | 2.45#21 | 7.2%#25 | |
| 26 | 2.43#25 | 9.1%#21 | |
| 27 | 2.41#27 | 10.0%#19 | |
| 28 | 2.34#31 | 8.9%#22 | |
| 29 | 2.44#23 | 1.8%#31 | |
| 30 | 2.44#24 | 0.0%#32 | |
| 31 | 2.39#29 | 4.1%#29 | |
| 32 | 2.34#32 | 6.5%#27 |
What the two axes are
Expected goals for per 60 (5-on-5). Expected goals created per 60 minutes of five-on-five play: how many goals an average finisher would score on these chances.
Shooting %. Goals per shot on goal. Over one season much of the gap between clubs is luck, not finishing skill.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
