NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
xGF% against PP%32 clubs
Colorado Avalanche are near the top of both: 1st in power play % (80.0%) and 1st in expected goals share (5-on-5) (52.5%). 10 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two move together loosely (r = 0.35).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | PP% | xGF% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80.0%#1 | 52.5%#1 | |
| 2 | 71.4%#2 | 51.3%#6 | |
| 3 | 33.3%#6 | 51.7%#2 | |
| 4 | 50.0%#3 | 50.9%#7 | |
| 5 | 40.0%#4 | 50.7%#9 | |
| 6 | 18.8%#14 | 51.4%#5 | |
| 7 | 25.0%#10 | 50.5%#11 | |
| 8 | 25.0%#11 | 50.3%#12 | |
| 9 | 0.0%#19 | 50.9%#8 | |
| 10 | 28.6%#8 | 49.5%#20 | |
| 11 | 33.3%#7 | 49.4%#22 | |
| 12 | 25.0%#13 | 50.2%#16 | |
| 13 | 7.7%#16 | 50.2%#14 | |
| 14 | 0.0%#29 | 51.4%#3 | |
| 15 | 28.6%#9 | 49.3%#25 | |
| 16 | 0.0%#17 | 50.2%#18 | |
| 17 | 0.0%#22 | 50.3%#13 | |
| 18 | 40.0%#5 | 47.7%#31 | |
| 19 | 0.0%#32 | 51.4%#4 | |
| 20 | 0.0%#18 | 49.7%#19 | |
| 21 | 25.0%#12 | 48.7%#27 | |
| 22 | 0.0%#24 | 50.2%#17 | |
| 23 | 0.0%#26 | 50.2%#15 | |
| 24 | 0.0%#31 | 50.6%#10 | |
| 25 | 18.2%#15 | 48.6%#28 | |
| 26 | 0.0%#23 | 49.4%#24 | |
| 27 | 0.0%#25 | 49.4%#23 | |
| 28 | 0.0%#20 | 48.6%#29 | |
| 29 | 0.0%#28 | 49.4%#21 | |
| 30 | 0.0%#21 | 46.6%#32 | |
| 31 | 0.0%#27 | 49.1%#26 | |
| 32 | 0.0%#30 | 48.5%#30 |
What the two axes are
Power play %. Power-play goals per power-play opportunity. It says nothing about how many power plays a club draws.
Expected goals share (5-on-5). The club's share of expected goals at five-on-five, from our shot model. Blocked shots are not counted.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
