NHL Team Explorer
Does a club that out-shoots its opponents also out-score them? Who creates chances and gives few back? Put any two team measures on the axes; better is always up and to the right.
2026-27 seasonour ratings are for 2026-27
PP xGF against PP%32 clubs
Colorado Avalanche have the best combined rank: 1st in power play % (80.0%) and 8th in power-play expected goals per game (0.73). 9 of 32 clubs are better than the middle on both. The two barely move together (r = 0.09).
Both measures, rankedordered by the average of the two ranks
| # | Team | PP% | PP xGF |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 80.0%#1 | 0.73#8 | |
| 2 | 33.3%#6 | 0.74#5 | |
| 3 | 25.0%#10 | 0.76#1 | |
| 4 | 50.0%#3 | 0.71#13 | |
| 5 | 18.8%#14 | 0.75#3 | |
| 6 | 7.7%#16 | 0.76#2 | |
| 7 | 25.0%#11 | 0.72#9 | |
| 8 | 33.3%#7 | 0.70#14 | |
| 9 | 71.4%#2 | 0.69#22 | |
| 10 | 0.0%#22 | 0.75#4 | |
| 11 | 25.0%#12 | 0.70#16 | |
| 12 | 0.0%#17 | 0.71#12 | |
| 13 | 0.0%#23 | 0.73#7 | |
| 14 | 40.0%#5 | 0.68#26 | |
| 15 | 28.6%#8 | 0.69#23 | |
| 16 | 25.0%#13 | 0.70#19 | |
| 17 | 40.0%#4 | 0.65#29 | |
| 18 | 18.2%#15 | 0.70#18 | |
| 19 | 28.6%#9 | 0.68#25 | |
| 20 | 0.0%#26 | 0.71#11 | |
| 21 | 0.0%#32 | 0.73#6 | |
| 22 | 0.0%#19 | 0.70#20 | |
| 23 | 0.0%#29 | 0.72#10 | |
| 24 | 0.0%#25 | 0.70#15 | |
| 25 | 0.0%#27 | 0.70#17 | |
| 26 | 0.0%#18 | 0.68#28 | |
| 27 | 0.0%#20 | 0.64#31 | |
| 28 | 0.0%#24 | 0.68#27 | |
| 29 | 0.0%#30 | 0.69#21 | |
| 30 | 0.0%#28 | 0.68#24 | |
| 31 | 0.0%#21 | 0.63#32 | |
| 32 | 0.0%#31 | 0.64#30 |
What the two axes are
Power play %. Power-play goals per power-play opportunity. It says nothing about how many power plays a club draws.
Power-play expected goals per game. Expected goals on the power play per game. It rewards drawing penalties as well as a dangerous power play.
A lower-is-better measure is drawn with its axis flipped, so the best clubs are always up and to the right. The dashed lines are the league median; r is how closely the two measures move together across the 32 clubs. Methodology →
