USC vs. Indiana Prediction, Odds & Pick
Prediction, odds and the model's read
Market vs our model
we are 6.9 toward
USC
| Market | Our model | |
|---|---|---|
| Spread | IU −10 | IU −3.1 |
IU win | 79% | 60% |
Calibrated against results, not against the closing line. Read this as our confidence, not as an edge over the market.
Scouting report
2026 projection · last season, roster and staff
Where USC gets at Indiana: 57th at hitting chunk plays, against a unit 111th at keeping everything in front of them. Where Indiana gets at USC: 10th in the push up front, against a unit 74th at holding the line of scrimmage. Indiana is also 15th at moving the ball on the ground, against a unit 54th.
How
USCattacks
IU
- 1
Take shots
hitting chunk plays · projected
USC#57 of 138
IU#111 of 138
How
IUattacks
USC
- 1
Establish the push up front
the push the line gets · projected
IU#10 of 138
USC#74 of 138 - 2
Lean on the run
moving the ball on the ground · projected
IU#15 of 138
USC#54 of 138
The two teams
USC
USC throws it: Lincoln Riley's offenses have been pass-leaning across 9 seasons. The strengths are offensive, led by 3rd at throwing it.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.9%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −24.8% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
USC has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Offensethrowing it#3projected
- Offensefirst and second down#3projected
- Offenseturning trips inside the 40 into points#4projected
Indiana
Indiana is in year 3 under Curt Cignetti, whose offenses have been balanced. The strengths are defensive, led by 2nd at stuffing runs at the line. The way in is 133rd at hitting chunk plays, and they are 111th at keeping everything in front of them.
On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+0.4%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −28.9% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.
Indiana has played 1 game against an average slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.
Projected strengths
- Defensegetting stopped at the line#2projected
- Defenserunning it#4projected
- Defensesacks and tackles for loss#4projected
Projected soft spots
- Offensehitting chunk plays#133projected
- Defensehitting chunk plays#111projected
Ranks are national. Nothing here is last season's number — carrying one forward is measurably worse than saying nothing — and in-season figures are adjusted for who was actually played. This describes the matchup; it is not a prediction and not a pick.
Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.
Model prediction
how the number is builtOur model simulates the game drive by drive from each side's opponent-adjusted efficiency (IU Elo 2113, USC Elo 1835 for reference), with home-field advantage. That projects IU -3.1 (60% to win) — 6.9 points clear of USC's market line of -10. That is a disagreement, not a betting edge — sides we favour have not covered at better than breakeven.
Why that percentage is worth reading: across 604 graded in-season games, the calls this model put near 58% came in at 58.2%. The full calibration table is published, bin by bin. Early in the season the cold-start path runs instead and calibrates less well (Brier 0.2028 against 0.1889).
Model as of Sep 1 · through week 1 · drive simulation
Where the game is won
2026 national rank · right is better
offensethe defense it faces
Moving the ball
USC26th24th
IU
IU16th57th
USCThrough the air
USC4th28th
IU
IU77th50th
USCOn the ground
USC74th35th
IU
IU38th25th
USCStaying on the field
USC6th40th
IU
IU12th60th
USCTaking care of it
USC95th53rd
IU
IU31st53rd
USC
Each bar runs from last in the country on the left to 1st on the right. The filled span is the gap between the offense and the defense it faces.
Season form — 2026
nationally rankedThe matchup, in context
series history + adjusted profiles| USC | IU | |
|---|---|---|
| +32.7 (#2) | CORE overall | +20.3 (#11) |
| +22 / -11 | offense / defense | +13 / -7 |
| 4.28 | points / drive | 5.78 |
| 1.11 | allowed / drive | 1.78 |
| 6% | three-and-outs | 11% |
| +5 | pass over expected | -7 |
Bold is the side ahead. CORE strips the situation from every play and solves the schedule out across the league, so these compare two teams that never met.
Key matchups
The analyst read: each team's offense splits crossed against the opponent's defense, with the edges called out.
Create a free account →You get Pro free for 6 months. No card required.
FAQ
Who will win USC vs. Indiana?
Gridpex's model favors Indiana with a 60% win probability.
What's the predicted spread for USC vs. Indiana?
The model projects Indiana by 3.1.
What time is USC vs. Indiana and what channel is it on?
Time TBD, at Memorial Stadium (Bloomington, IN).
Where this number comes from. Every projection on this page is produced by the same model, run before kickoff on opponent-adjusted efficiency, power ratings and situational data — walk-forward validated on eleven seasons and never adjusted after the fact. How the model works →
