Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Wake Forest change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Louisville a 8.0-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Louisville it is +11.4, at Wake Forest +4.6 (from Louisville's side).
- Neutral
- +8.0
- 71.2 poss.
- At Louisville
- +11.4
- 71.2 poss.
- At Wake Forest
- +4.6
- 71.2 poss.
Margins are from Louisville's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Louisville |  Wake Forest |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +21.015 | +9.864 |
| Adjusted offence | 119.213 | 113.659 |
| Adjusted defence | 98.223 | 103.8105 |
| Adjusted tempo | 71.591 | 71.0126 |
| Raw offence | 117.523 | 111.093 |
| Raw defence | 100.845 | 108.2216 |
| Effective FG% | 56.4%20 | 52.4%127 |
| Turnover rate | 16.2%228 | 14.6%105 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 89.4%200 | 102.8%149 |
| Free-throw rate | 33.8%218 | 35.5%166 |
| Opponent eFG% | 48.0%39 | 51.8%198 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.8%162 | 16.9%94 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 23.0%95 | 4.8%196 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 32.2%112 | 35.2%186 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 53.2%4 | 43.7%95 |
| Raw tempo | 72.371 | 71.4104 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.