Skip to content

Compare College Basketball Teams

In progress. College basketball is still being built and is not in the navigation. The ratings are ours and are shown with the date they were fitted; they are not graded in public.

How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?

2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet

Team 1: St. Thomas-Minnesota change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: UT Rio Grande Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)

On a neutral floor the ratings make St. Thomas-Minnesota a 0.7-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at St. Thomas-Minnesota it is +4.0, at UT Rio Grande Valley -2.6 (from St. Thomas-Minnesota's side).

Neutral
+0.7
69.3 poss.
At St. Thomas-Minnesota
+4.0
69.3 poss.
At UT Rio Grande Valley
-2.6
69.3 poss.

Margins are from St. Thomas-Minnesota's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.

MetricSt. Thomas-MinnesotaUT Rio Grande Valley
Adjusted efficiency margin+7.086+6.094
Adjusted offence112.176109.2123
Adjusted defence105.1130103.287
Adjusted tempo69.520869.2229
Raw offence115.144109.2125
Raw defence103.185101.558
Effective FG%59.4%554.7%44
Turnover rate12.8%2116.7%261
Offensive rebound rate68.0%308—
Free-throw rate34.4%19528.9%329
Opponent eFG%50.7%13547.8%36
Opponent turnover rate16.2%13215.2%205
Defensive rebound rate33.5%46-201.0%351
Opponent free-throw rate30.2%6839.0%282
Three-point attempt rate46.5%3843.7%94
Raw tempo70.416068.4255

How this is measured

The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.

Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.