Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Virginia change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Utah Valley change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Virginia a 9.1-point favourite at about 70 possessions; at Virginia it is +12.5, at Utah Valley +5.8 (from Virginia's side).
- Neutral
- +9.1
- 69.8 poss.
- At Virginia
- +12.5
- 69.8 poss.
- At Utah Valley
- +5.8
- 69.8 poss.
Margins are from Virginia's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Virginia |  Utah Valley |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +20.916 | +7.981 |
| Adjusted offence | 117.923 | 109.8108 |
| Adjusted defence | 97.016 | 102.059 |
| Adjusted tempo | 68.8250 | 70.8138 |
| Raw offence | 117.324 | 109.2127 |
| Raw defence | 99.231 | 99.029 |
| Effective FG% | 54.0%67 | 54.9%40 |
| Turnover rate | 15.0%138 | 18.9%350 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 89.6%197 | 160.1%42 |
| Free-throw rate | 32.9%240 | 38.3%95 |
| Opponent eFG% | 45.5%6 | 49.4%77 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 14.4%251 | 19.8%6 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 9.4%172 | -78.1%333 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 33.0%127 | 39.2%287 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 46.9%35 | 32.9%317 |
| Raw tempo | 69.2223 | 71.3106 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.