Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: McNeese change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Louisville a 6.2-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at McNeese it is -2.8, at Louisville -9.6 (from McNeese's side).
- Neutral
- -6.2
- 70.6 poss.
- At McNeese
- -2.8
- 70.6 poss.
- At Louisville
- -9.6
- 70.6 poss.
Margins are from McNeese's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  McNeese |  Louisville |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +12.249 | +21.015 |
| Adjusted offence | 112.769 | 119.213 |
| Adjusted defence | 100.544 | 98.223 |
| Adjusted tempo | 69.6203 | 71.591 |
| Raw offence | 112.968 | 117.523 |
| Raw defence | 99.130 | 100.845 |
| Effective FG% | 50.7%206 | 56.4%20 |
| Turnover rate | 13.1%23 | 16.2%228 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 144.3%51 | 89.4%200 |
| Free-throw rate | 37.4%118 | 33.8%218 |
| Opponent eFG% | 49.3%75 | 48.0%39 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 22.0%1 | 15.8%162 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -58.6%318 | 23.0%95 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 42.1%323 | 32.2%112 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 35.2%266 | 53.2%4 |
| Raw tempo | 68.1268 | 72.371 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.