Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Hofstra change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Louisville a 8.0-point favourite at about 69 possessions; at Hofstra it is -4.6, at Louisville -11.3 (from Hofstra's side).
- Neutral
- -8.0
- 69.4 poss.
- At Hofstra
- -4.6
- 69.4 poss.
- At Louisville
- -11.3
- 69.4 poss.
Margins are from Hofstra's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Hofstra |  Louisville |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +9.666 | +21.015 |
| Adjusted offence | 111.979 | 119.213 |
| Adjusted defence | 102.367 | 98.223 |
| Adjusted tempo | 67.3313 | 71.591 |
| Raw offence | 111.977 | 117.523 |
| Raw defence | 101.254 | 100.845 |
| Effective FG% | 51.4%176 | 56.4%20 |
| Turnover rate | 14.5%99 | 16.2%228 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 74.3%270 | 89.4%200 |
| Free-throw rate | 31.6%262 | 33.8%218 |
| Opponent eFG% | 46.3%13 | 48.0%39 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 13.7%310 | 15.8%162 |
| Defensive rebound rate | 30.5%60 | 23.0%95 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 35.1%184 | 32.2%112 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 42.8%119 | 53.2%4 |
| Raw tempo | 67.1306 | 72.371 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.