Compare College Basketball Teams
How would two teams match up, by how much, and at what pace — and where does each rank?
2025-26 seasonthrough ratings as of 2026-04-06most recent completed season — 2026-27 has no ratings yet
Team 1: Auburn change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
Team 2: Louisville change (top 100 by AdjEM; any team via its page)
On a neutral floor the ratings make Louisville a 5.3-point favourite at about 71 possessions; at Auburn it is -1.9, at Louisville -8.7 (from Auburn's side).
- Neutral
- -5.3
- 70.9 poss.
- At Auburn
- -1.9
- 70.9 poss.
- At Louisville
- -8.7
- 70.9 poss.
Margins are from Auburn's side, from the snapshot of 2026-04-06.
| Metric |  Auburn |  Louisville |
|---|---|---|
| Adjusted efficiency margin | +13.544 | +21.015 |
| Adjusted offence | 118.419 | 119.213 |
| Adjusted defence | 104.9125 | 98.223 |
| Adjusted tempo | 70.2168 | 71.591 |
| Raw offence | 116.134 | 117.523 |
| Raw defence | 110.8284 | 100.845 |
| Effective FG% | 53.0%103 | 56.4%20 |
| Turnover rate | 13.9%60 | 16.2%228 |
| Offensive rebound rate | 160.4%41 | 89.4%200 |
| Free-throw rate | 43.3%17 | 33.8%218 |
| Opponent eFG% | 53.7%288 | 48.0%39 |
| Opponent turnover rate | 15.3%193 | 15.8%162 |
| Defensive rebound rate | -119.3%345 | 23.0%95 |
| Opponent free-throw rate | 34.3%161 | 32.2%112 |
| Three-point attempt rate | 40.2%163 | 53.2%4 |
| Raw tempo | 71.3105 | 72.371 |
How this is measured
The projection is the existing projectMargin from lib/cbb/ratings: (AdjEM difference ± the fitted home advantage) × expected possessions ÷ 100, with pace the mean of the two adjusted tempos. It uses the latest snapshot, so it describes the two teams as rated on 2026-04-06 — it is not a line and it is not graded here.
Ranks are out of 364 rated teams, 1 = best; bold marks the better of the two where a metric has a better end.