Skip to content

Maryland Terrapins

Big Ten·2-0·
Elo
1424#84
SP+
9.1#37
FPI
2.9
AP
NR
Nextvs Virginia Tech · Wk 3Win prob 65%Model -6.1
Talent #46 (719.6)Recruiting class #4354% production returning

Team Leaders

Latest on Maryland

All news

UConn's Short-yardage game meets the wrong defense

Matchup · 5d ago

DeJuan Williams produced six of Maryland's eleven explosive plays

Matchup · 6d ago

Roster · 108 players

FR 35SO 27JR 22SR 24
#PlayerPosClHtWt
6Cardell WilliamsQBSR6'2"181
7Malik WashingtonQBSO6'5"231
12Nathan BernhardQBFR6'5"227
15Jackson HamiltonQBFR5'11"185
22Jack CapaldiQBSR6'3"210
23Max LawrenceQBJR6'3"200
0DeJuan WilliamsRBSO5'11"215
24Iverson HowardRBSO5'11"195
25Harry Dalton IIIRBFR5'10"205
26Terrez WorthyRBSR5'11"180
29Liam WillsonRBJR6'1"210
45Solomon FoyeRBFR6'2"210
20DJ SamuelsFBJR6'1"238
1Na'eem Abdul-Rahim GladdingWRJR6'0"190
2Kaleb WebbWRSR6'5"201
10Zymear SmithWRFR6'0"178
11Ryan ManningWRJR5'11"191
13Chris Durr Jr.WRJR5'11"173
14Jordan ScottWRSR6'7"220
17Jayden KitchensWRFR6'3"190
18Josiah TeasleyWRFR6'5"190
21Sean WilliamsWRJR6'2"178
80Ejani ShakirWRJR6'0"190
83Emerson SmithWRSO6'1"185
88Justin DeVaughnWRFR5'9"166
8Preston HowardTESR6'5"236
9Dorian FlemingTEJR6'3"245
16Damon Hall Jr.TEFR6'5"205
39Daniel OwensTESR6'4"266
81Javonte WilliamsTEFR6'4"220
84Thomas McCluskeyTEJR6'8"245
85JT TaggartTESO6'7"236
86Brayden MarkoTEFR6'6"240
89AJ SzymanskiTESR6'6"244
50Trevor SzymanskiOLSO6'6"289
51Michael McMonigleOLFR6'7"297
54Lamar WilliamsOLFR6'7"290
55Tellek LocketteOLSR6'3"327
57Jesse MoodyOLFR6'6"345
61Michael HersheyOLJR6'5"295
64Aaron FoliviOLSR6'5"325
66Teagan CoxOLFR6'5"310
67Jonathan PanagouOLFR6'4"295
68Carlos MooreOLSR6'6"305
69Logan BennettOLSO6'6"315
70Jaylen GilchristOLFR6'5"299
71Ryan HowertonOLSO6'6"332
72Ben BeymerOLFR6'8"317
73Davon WatkinsOLSO6'4"316
74Isaiah WrightOLSR6'5"315
75Day'Jon MooreOLFR6'3"305
76Rahtrel PerryOLSR6'5"317
77Amory HillsOLSO6'5"330
78Anthony RobsockOLSO6'7"300
0Zion EleeDLFR6'4"220
9Zahir MathisDLSO6'6"222
10Cam Brickle IIDLFR6'2"305
11Sidney StewartDLSO6'2"255
34Jianni DavisDLFR6'1"230
40Nahsir TaylorDLSO6'3"258
44Joel StarlingsDLJR6'4"302
50EJ Moore Jr.DLJR6'2"292
54JaMarcus WhyceDLFR6'2"300
56DD HolmesDLSO6'7"263
57Bryce JenkinsDLSO6'6"350
58Joshua SimmonsDLSO6'6"286
88Derrick LeBlancDLJR6'5"295
90Delmar WhiteDLFR6'2"340
95Armon ParkerDLSR6'3"320
97Jayvon ParkerDLSR6'3"330
98Eyan ThomasDLJR6'3"328
99Lavon JohnsonDLSR6'2"310
1Daniel WingateLBSR6'5"230
3Trey ReddickLBJR6'4"218
19Stephen Dean IIILBSR6'2"230
23Jordan WilliamsLBSR6'2"215
27Kaden CarterLBFR6'2"205
30Travares Daniels IILBFR6'2"213
32Carlton SmithLBSO6'1"222
35Keyari JamesLBSO6'3"236
48Darius GrimesLBJR6'2"221
49Chris WellsLBJR6'1"246
53Kellen McConnellLBSO6'2"232
2Lavain ScruggsDBSR6'3"215
4Jamare GlaskerDBSR6'1"185
5Darrell CareyDBFR6'2"185
6Dontay JoynerDBSR6'0"180
7Gavin EdwardsDBJR6'1"193
8Mekhai WhiteDBSO6'5"201
12Jayden ShippsDBSO6'1"182
14Sean JohnsonDBFR6'1"175
15Lloyd Irvin IIIDBSO6'3"196
18Alex MooreDBJR6'1"189
20Ontario Washington Jr.DBFR5'10"170
21Judah JenkinsDBSO5'11"185
22Zahir CobbDBFR6'2"180
24Amari JacksonDBSR5'11"190
25Ricardo Cooper Jr.DBJR5'9"175
26Hakim SatterwhiteDBFR6'2"180
33Messiah DelhommeDBSO6'2"196
38Taylor BestDBJR6'0"183
36Sean O'HairePKSO6'2"188
86Eli FulcherPKFR6'0"180
98Daniel LeahyPKFR6'6"225
34Bryce McFersonPSR6'2"191
43Philip NoyesPSO6'3"212
59Rory KnippLSFR6'1"215
97Luke O'HareLSFR6'0"193

Team Statistics · per game, with national FBS rank

Points / game
50.0
scoring offense
Points allowed
7.0
scoring defense
Differential
+43.0
per game
Offense
Total yards / game
560.5#9
Yards / play
7.2#26
Passing yards / game
315.5#21
Rushing yards / game
245.0#23
First downs / game
29.0#5
3rd down %
55.2%#17
4th down %
60.0%#62
Time of possession
32:17#38
Defense
Yards allowed / game
154.0#4
Yards / play allowed
3.0#5
Pass yards allowed / game
115.5#8
Rush yards allowed / game
38.5#5
3rd down % allowed
26.9%#29
Sacks
10#4
Tackles for loss
14#29
Turnovers & Discipline
Turnover margin
+4#11
Takeaways
4#22
Giveaways
0#1
Penalties / game
5.5#38
Penalty yards / game
53.5#62

Rank is national among all FBS teams (#1 = best), oriented so higher rank = better even for defensive and discipline metrics. Bars show percentile.

Scouting Report · 2026 projection

heavily pass-leaning

Maryland throws it: Mike Locksley's offenses have been heavily pass-leaning across 6 seasons. The strengths are defensive, led by 14th at keeping everything in front of them. The way in is 109th on first and second down.

On fourth down he goes for it about as often as his peers do from the same spots (+1.0%). Against what the expected-points model recommends he is −21.6% — the profession as a whole is negative on this.

Maryland has played 2 games against a genuinely tough slate, adjusted for here. That football carries about 0% of what is below; the rest is still the preseason projection.

Projected strengths

  • Defensehitting chunk plays
    #14
    projected
  • Defenseturning trips inside the 40 into points
    #33
    projected
  • Defensethrowing it
    #35
    projected

Projected soft spots

  • Offensefirst and second down
    #109
    projected

Each bar is where this team sits in the country. Before the season has produced enough football these are PROJECTIONS — last season regressed to the mean, plus talent, returning production, recruiting and whether the staff is the same one — and the season replaces them as it is played. Head coaches only — there is no free feed for coordinators, so on a program where the head coach does not call the offense this describes the staff he hired. Play-calling identity is a style, not a grade: throwing more than the situations warrant is not better than throwing less than they warrant.

2026 Season Projection

model win prob · 10 to play
6.85.2
projected final record (now 20)
Exp. wins left
4.8
of 10 games
Bowl odds
81%
reach 6 wins
Best odds
69%
vs Rutgers
Toughest
6%
vs Ohio State

How the season could finish · 2026 · chance of each final win total · 10 games left

Every remaining game simulated from the model's win probability for it. Tallest bar is the single likeliest finish, not a prediction that it happens.

23456789101112
final winstallest bar = 27% chance
Likeliest finish 7-5 (27%)Bowl eligible 81% · marked on the axis at 6

Player Value

EPA contribution by position group + estimated NIL market value (derived from position rates and on-field production — not actual deal figures).

Unit Value — Total EPA
QBMalik Washington
+21.9 EPA
WRKaleb Webb, Ryan Manning +1
+17.0 EPA
RBHarry Dalton III, Iverson Howard +1
+10.9 EPA
TEPreston Howard, AJ Szymanski +1
+0.9 EPA

Total EPA produced by each positional group this season. OL value is captured via the rush/pass efficiency of skill players; OL-specific EPA isn't separately reported.

Estimated NIL Market Value
ESTIMATED
EPA +21.90.332/play66 snaps
EPA +11.20.507/play22 snaps
EPA +5.60.244/play23 snaps

Estimated from position-group market rates and on-field EPA contribution. Actual NIL valuations depend on social media following, brand fit, and market negotiations — these figures are directional only.

The Five Factors

ranked vs. FBS · bar = better
Efficiency (PPA)
Off0.3579th#30
Def-0.0685th#21
Explosiveness
Off1.3875th#35
Def1.4515th#118
Field position
Off63.28th#127
Def74.032nd#94
Finishing (pts/opp)
Off4.3058th#58
Def4.679th#125
Turnovers
Won 4Lost 0
Margin +4

Opponent-adjusted efficiency

EPA/play vs. schedule
Offense
Defense
Off · pass
0.4164th#51
Off · rush
0.3082nd#26

Pass vs. rush (PPA)

Rushing
Off0.3080th#28
Def-0.3197th#5
Passing
Off0.4164th#51
Def0.2736th#89

Trenches & disruption

Line yards (off)
3.20#53
2nd-level / open-field
1.07 / 2.71
Power / stuff (off)
50.0% / 19.0%
Havoc — total (def)
21.9%#23
Havoc — front 7 / DB
17.1% / 4.8%

Standard vs. passing downs

Pro
Std downs
Off0.27
Def-0.30
Pass downs
Off0.63
Def0.26

PPA on each down type (off vs. def).

Opponent-adjusted by down

Pro
1st2nd3rd
Offense0.44#80.06#1020.61#58
Defense-0.35#70.21#870.07#22

Elo Trajectory

HamptonFinal
Elo rating 14241495+71 over season

Team Fingerprint · 2026 · 43 opponent-adjusted metrics · percentile vs 138 FBS teams

Plot these →
worst in FBSbest

Efficiency

  • Offense EPA/play0.3882nd
  • Defense EPA/play allowed-0.0985th
  • Offense success rate53%85th
  • Defense success rate allowed27%93rd

Downs

  • Offense success — standard downs56%81st
  • Offense success — passing downs42%82nd
  • Defense success allowed — standard downs31%90th
  • Defense success allowed — passing downs21%75th

Explosiveness

  • Offense explosiveness1.356th
  • Defense explosiveness allowed1.256th
  • Offense explosiveness — standard downs1.166th
  • Offense explosiveness — passing downs1.834th

Trenches

  • Offense line yards3.582nd
  • Defense line yards allowed1.497th
  • Offense highlight yards1.877th
  • Defense highlight yards allowed0.2983rd
  • Offense power success0.6736th
  • Defense power success allowed0.6754th
  • Offense stuff rate0.1750th
  • Defense stuff rate0.3091st

Third down

  • Third down conversion55%86th
  • Third down distance faced6.080th
  • Third down conversion allowed32%69th
  • Third down distance forced9.293rd

Halves

  • Net success rate — first half0.1877th
  • Net success rate — second half0.3195th

Drives

  • Points per drive3.581st
  • Points per drive allowed1.379th
  • Average starting field position3793rd
  • Opponent starting field position2575th
  • Available yards gained63%80th
  • Available yards allowed31%88th
  • Scoring opportunities per drive91%79th
  • Scoring opportunities allowed64%93rd
  • Points per scoring opportunity3.878th
  • Points allowed per opportunity2.078th
  • Three-and-out rate18%74th
  • Three-and-outs forced36%82nd

Roster

  • Returning usage71%84th
  • Returning EPA11254th
  • Team talent composite72067th
  • Recruiting class rank43.069th
  • Recruiting class points21669th

Every metric is opponent-adjusted and ranked so that higher is always better — a defensive rate that is good when low is ranked accordingly. Sack and tackle-for-loss composition are deliberately absent: their relationship to team quality is a measured null, so they carry a style rather than a rank, and they appear in the pressure signature instead.

Intelligence Report

Offensive DNA

Balanced offense performing above the national average
EPA/play
+0.348#30 · above avg
Pass EPA/play
+0.405#51
Rush EPA/play
+0.296#28
Explosiveness
1.380#35
Pts/opportunity
4.30#58
Success rate
50.5%

Pass efficiency edge: 0.110 EPA/play

🛡

Defensive Identity

High-pressure defense suppressing opponents below the national average
EPA/play allowed
-0.059#21 · top 20%
Havoc rate (total)
21.9%#23
Front-7 havoc
17.1%
DB havoc
4.8%
Big play rate allowed
1.451#118
Success rate allowed
27.4%

Disruption comes primarily from the front seven.

📊

Season Signature

50.0 PPG offense, 7.0 allowed — +43.0 margin/game
Points per game
50.0
Points allowed/game
7.0
Scoring margin/game
+43.0
Turnover margin
+4won 4 · lost 0
Production returning
54%
Talent rank (247)
#46

2-0 record through 2 games.

Team Shape · percentile vs. FBS · dashed = 50th

OFFENSE79thEXPLOSIVENESS75thFINISHING58thFIELD POS8thDEFENSE85thHAVOC84th50th100th
Offense
79th
Explosiveness
75th
Finishing
58th
Field Pos
8th
Defense
85th
Havoc
84th

Each axis = national percentile rank. 100th = best in FBS, 0th = worst. Defense and Havoc are oriented so higher = better.

CORE efficiency · situation and opponent removed

Points per 100 plays above average, after the game state is regressed out of every snap and the schedule is solved out across the whole league. The version of this team’s efficiency that can be compared to a team it never played.

Overall
+5.1
#52
Offense
+0.6
#60
Defense
-4.5
#50
Full CORE ratings →

What a possession is worth · 11 drives

MeasureOffenseDefense
Points per drive3.461.27
Starting field positionown 36.5own 25.1
Available yards63.0%31.4%
Scoring opportunities90.9%63.6%
Points per opportunity3.802.00
Three-and-out rate18.2%36.4%
Every team’s drive efficiency →

Play-calling identity

Against what the league calls from the same down, distance, field position, score and clock — so this is the staff, not the game script.

Pass rate
62.9%
Expected, given the spots
43.6%
Over expected
+19.3
Fourth down vs peers
-7
Fourth down vs the model
-50
All play-calling tendencies →

National Landscape · 2026 FBS · offense vs. defense EPA/play

Each dot = one FBS team. Maryland is highlighted. Tap or hover a dot for details.

ELITEDEF. FORTRESSOFF. POWERHOUSEREBUILDING-0.100.00+0.10+0.20+0.30-0.050.00+0.10+0.20Offensive EPA/play← worsebetter →Defensive EPA allowed/play← worsebetter →

Similar Programs

Teams with the closest offense + defense efficiency profile to Maryland in 2026

by EPA/play distance
TennesseeSP+ +19.9
Off EPA/play +0.345Def EPA/play -0.059Elo 1691
Match
100%
South CarolinaSP+ +16.7
Off EPA/play +0.347Def EPA/play -0.047Elo 1742
Match
99%
North CarolinaSP+ +5.8
Off EPA/play +0.330Def EPA/play -0.046Elo 1398
Match
99%
ToledoSP+ -9.4
Off EPA/play +0.368Def EPA/play -0.077Elo 1568
Match
98%
Air ForceSP+ +1.1
Off EPA/play +0.315Def EPA/play -0.011Elo 1424
Match
97%
MissouriSP+ +12.9
Off EPA/play +0.319Def EPA/play +0.021Elo 1703
Match
95%

Similarity = normalized Euclidean distance on season offensive and defensive EPA/play. Teams within ±0.02 EPA/play on both units score >90%.

Program Trajectory · CORE rating · 20152026 · points per game vs an average FBS team

2015: -3.9, #80 of 1282016: -5.3, #87 of 1282017: -11.3, #100 of 1302018: +8.3, #33 of 1302019: -16.9, #114 of 1302020: -4.1, #80 of 1242021: +6.8, #50 of 1302022: +11.0, #27 of 1312023: +16.7, #17 of 1332024: -3.5, #78 of 1342025: -3.8, #75 of 1362026: +5.1, #52 of 138
20152026
Now +5.1 · #52 of 138Best +16.7 in 2023Worst -16.9 in 2019

Program History

recent seasons
YearOverallConfWin %xWLuck
20261-00-0
100%
1.0+0.0
20254-81-8
33%
5.5-1.5
20244-81-8
33%
3.5+0.5
20238-54-5
62%
8.7-0.7
20228-54-5
62%
7.8+0.2
20217-63-6
54%
6.1+0.9
20202-32-3
40%
2.3-0.3
20193-91-8
25%
3.3-0.3
20185-73-6
42%
6.0-1.0
20174-82-7
33%
3.1+0.9

xW = expected wins from per-game dominance. Luck = actual − expected (positive = won close games).

3.9%of 50,000 simulated 2026 seasons end with them in the field

1-0 so far, projected to finish 6.6-5.4. Wins the Big Ten in 0.6%.

If they finish with…

100%
1 loss
53%
2 losses
1.0%
3 losses
0%
4 losses

Their chance of making it at each final loss count. Better than even up to 2.

down 0.0 points since preseason.

  • At 2 losses they are 53% where the average Big Ten team is 69%.
  • The Big Ten takes 2.71 bids in an average season, and four or more in 18%.

Maryland’s own turning points

Points of playoff probability between winning and losing.

  • wk6at Ohio State21.5
  • wk12at USC10.9
  • wk13vs Penn State9.7
  • wk5at Nebraska9.3
  • wk4vs UCLA7.1
  • wk3vs Virginia Tech6.8

Who to root for

Games Maryland is not in that move its odds most. Same units, much smaller scale.

  • wk12App State over UL Monroe0.7
  • wk8Minnesota over Iowa0.7
  • wk5Boston College over SMU0.7
  • wk4Eastern Michigan over Lindenwood0.7
  • wk3Florida State over Alabama0.6
  • wk11Central Michigan over Sacramento State0.6
The full playoff picture →

Big Ten

0-0 in league play, projected 4.1-4.911 of 18 by title odds
0.6%
Wins the Big Ten
2.2%
Reaches the title game

The Big Ten sends its top two by conference winning percentage, head-to-head breaking a tie. The last berth is level on percentage in 50% of simulated seasons, so a tiebreaker decides it about that often.

  • wk6Maryland at Ohio State5.0
  • wk12Maryland at USC1.6
  • wk13Penn State at Maryland1.6
  • wk5Maryland at Nebraska1.4

Points of title probability riding on each result. The whole Big Ten race →

If not the playoff, then

71%
Bowl eligible
62%
Placed in a bowl
3.9%
In the playoff
34%
Season over in November

Maryland is 2-0 and needs 4 more wins from 10 games to reach the six that make a team eligible — at most one of which may come against an FCS opponent. In 4.8% of seasons they get there and still go nowhere: there are more eligible teams than seats.

  • LA Bowl8.2%
  • GameAbove Sports Bowl8.1%
  • Rate Bowl7.6%
  • Pinstripe Bowl6.7%
  • Las Vegas Bowl6.3%
  • Music City Bowl4.9%

Every bowl, and how each one picks →

Recruiting Pipelines

since 2010

Of the 170 high-school programs with a pipeline page here, 13 have sent Maryland a player since 2010 — 76 signees between them. Where they signed, not where they were offered, and not a complete list of Maryland's feeder schools: only these 170 have the outcome history to measure.

High schoolSignedDrafted
St. Frances AcademyMD171
DeMatha CatholicMD152
Our Lady of Good CounselMD101
St. John's CollegeDC100
Friendship AcademyDC52
Archbishop CarrollDC31
Imhotep InstitutePA31
Glades CentralFL30
All 170 high-school pipelines →
✓/✗ = whether our pregame model picked the winner. Win % & projections from the Gridpex model. Data: CollegeFootballData.