Skip to content
Tad Hudson

#12Tad Hudson

Tad Hudson is a Dual-Threat QB for Coastal Carolina. Tad's 2025 season ranks in the 0th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 233 plays — a developing rate for the QB.

What projects, and what doesn't · QBs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.46
    Beats guessing the QB average by 16%. n=2,421 QB seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.05
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=1,965 QB seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.51
    Beats guessing the QB average by 20%. n=1,965 QB seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Tad Hudson's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2025 Production

Passing
139/254 Comp/Att1253 Pass yards6 Pass TD7 INT54.7% Comp %
Rushing
15 Rush yards2 Rush TD45 Carries0.3 Yards/carry

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs QB peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume100
  • Dual-Threat100
  • Consistency0
  • Clutch100
Player type
Dual-Threat QB

A genuine rushing threat who stresses defenses horizontally. Extends plays with legs and forces extra gap assignments.

Rushing threatScrambles for valueStresses defensive structure
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency0th %ile · below avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs QB peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • High-volume role — one of the team's most-used QBs by play share.
  • High game-to-game variance — boom-or-bust profile.
  • Particularly dangerous on passing downs — efficiency spikes in obvious pass situations.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.18 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 0.62 EPA/play in Wk 2 vs Charleston Southern.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Starter

Meaningful starter. Local collective + position-group deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+0.9700.97Wk 1 vs Virginia: -0.97 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs Charleston Southern: +0.62 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs East Carolina: -0.05 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs South Alabama: +0.19 EPA/play4Wk 6 vs Old Dominion: +0.12 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs UL Monroe: +0.37 EPA/play7Wk 12 vs Georgia Southern: +0.23 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs South Carolina: +0.12 EPA/play13Wk 14 vs James Madison: -0.06 EPA/play14
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+C/ATTPass YdsPass TDINTQBRRush YdsRush TDEPA/play
1@VirginiaL7-4811.10/10000.1-0.97
2vsCharleston SouthernW13-03/5370074.41910.62
3vsEast CarolinaL0-388.019/391720213.5-150-0.05
4@South AlabamaW38-20-12.713/251122045.11810.19
6@Old DominionL7-475.919/301081139.6-1700.12
7vsUL MonroeW23-8-21.62/3180032.22000.37
12@Georgia SouthernL40-45-9.415/281730121.31000.23
13@South CarolinaL7-515.927/361740065.91600.12
14vsJames MadisonL10-5912.316/381481134.4-130-0.06
20vsLouisiana TechL14-23-1.325/493112227.8-230

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
43.1%
Passing plays
76.4%
Rushing plays
9.0%
Standard downs
33.6%
Passing downs
59.3%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.05
Passing downs
0.30
Pass / Rush EPA
0.10 / 0.48

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.