Skip to content
Samajie Grant

#10Samajie Grant

WR·Arizona·20160.3 pts line value1st Round

Samajie Grant is a Versatile WR for Arizona. Samajie's 2016 season ranks in the 40th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 80 plays — a developing rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Samajie Grant's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2016 Production

Rushing
461 Rush yards6 Rush TD74 Carries6.2 Yards/carry
Receiving
22 Receptions247 Rec yards3 Rec TD11.2 Yards/rec

Performance Analysis · 2016 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency40
  • Volume35
  • Explosiveness28
  • Consistency54
  • Pass-Down0
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)40th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency54th %ile · average
Key findings
  • 4 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Production faded as the season progressed — 0.13 EPA/play decline from first to second half.
  • Peak game: 1.44 EPA/play in Wk 6 vs Utah (SP+ 11).

Historical Comparables · WR · efficiency + volume + value

Players from 2013–2025 matched on EPA efficiency, play volume, and adjusted value tier — not just one metric.

PlayerTeamWEPA/playLine valTotal EPA
Justin LynchTemple0.2400.315.1
Malik DunnerBall State0.2900.422.0
Justin LynchNorthern Illinois0.2300.715.2
Eli HeidenreichNavy0.2200.815.4
Dawan ScottMiami (OH)0.2800.818.5

Comps are statistical — efficiency, volume, and value tier all factor in. Style and conference context differ.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+1.4401.44Wk 2 vs Grambling: +0.79 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Hawai'i: -0.15 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Washington: -0.12 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs UCLA: +0.22 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Utah: +1.44 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs USC: +1.23 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Stanford: +0.09 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Washington State: +0.09 EPA/play10Wk 12 vs Oregon State: -0.30 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Arizona State: +0.43 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1vsBYUL16-188.03144.706
2vsGramblingW31-2159519.00700.79
3vsHawai'iW47-28-10.12178.5011-0.15
4vsWashingtonL28-3526.7144.004-0.12
5@UCLAL24-459.111212.01120.22
6@UtahL23-3610.948621.51631.44
7vsUSCL14-4823.63237.71121.23
9vsStanfordL10-3416.40.09
10@Washington StateL7-696.21-2-2.0000.09
11vsColoradoL24-496.3133.003
12@Oregon StateL17-42-4.61-5-5.000-0.30
13vsArizona StateW56-35-3.00.43

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
12.2%
Passing plays
9.6%
Rushing plays
14.1%
Standard downs
13.2%
Passing downs
9.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
0.46
Passing downs
-0.08
Pass / Rush EPA
0.67 / 0.16

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

Career · rolling EPA, game by game

Per-game EPA5-game avg
+1.610−0.47
EPA per play · 2016 · 10 games

Chart shows per-game EPA (bars) and rolling 5-game average (line). Season breaks marked with dashed lines. Line value = est. points over replacement per game.

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.