Skip to content
Ricky Pearsall

#1Ricky Pearsall

Ricky Pearsall is a Versatile WR for Florida. Ricky's 2023 season ranks in the 100th percentile nationally by opponent-adjusted EPA per play across 74 plays — a elite rate for the WR.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Ricky Pearsall's projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

2023 Production

Receiving
64 Receptions970 Rec yards4 Rec TD15.2 Yards/rec
Returns
11 Punt returns126 PR yards0 PR TD

Performance Analysis · 2023 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency100
  • Volume28
  • Explosiveness54
  • Consistency84
  • Pass-Down52
Player type
Versatile WR

Balanced profile without a single dominant trait — contributes across multiple dimensions.

Balanced usageMulti-role
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)100th %ile · elite
Game-to-game consistency84th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Top-10% efficiency among WRs — elite opponent-adjusted EPA rate.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.
  • 11 high-impact games (EPA/play > 0.4) this season — elite ceiling.
  • Strong second-half surge — EPA/play improved 0.42 from the first to second half of the season.
  • Peak game: 2.46 EPA/play in Wk 13 vs Florida State (SP+ 19).

NIL Market Tier· 2023

On3 valuation ↗
Elite

Top-3 player at position nationally. Collective + national brand deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · box score + EPA, week by week

+2.4602.46Wk 1 vs Utah: +0.44 EPA/play1Wk 2 vs McNeese: +1.17 EPA/play2Wk 3 vs Tennessee: +0.16 EPA/play3Wk 4 vs Charlotte: +1.11 EPA/play4Wk 5 vs Kentucky: +1.65 EPA/play5Wk 6 vs Vanderbilt: +1.65 EPA/play6Wk 7 vs South Carolina: +1.18 EPA/play7Wk 9 vs Georgia: +0.88 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Arkansas: +0.97 EPA/play10Wk 11 vs LSU: +0.95 EPA/play11Wk 12 vs Missouri: +2.28 EPA/play12Wk 13 vs Florida State: +2.46 EPA/play13
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+RecRec YdsAvgRec TDLongEPA/play
1@UtahL11-248.589211.50400.44
2vsMcNeeseW49-7612320.51501.17
3vsTennesseeW29-1616.26437.2090.16
4vsCharlotteW22-7-21.4610417.30271.11
5@KentuckyL14-3310.536220.71331.65
6vsVanderbiltW38-14-12.74348.50181.65
7@South CarolinaW41-394.31016616.61261.18
9vsGeorgiaL20-4331.269916.50290.88
10vsArkansasL36-393.555511.01320.97
11@LSUL35-5219.1710314.70330.95
12@MissouriL31-3319.327236.00612.28
13vsFlorida StateL15-2419.411717.00172.46

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
9.8%
Passing plays
18.2%
Rushing plays
0.8%
Standard downs
8.8%
Passing downs
11.7%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
1.00
Passing downs
1.01
Pass / Rush EPA
0.95 / 2.22

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.