Skip to content
Qumonte Williams Jr.
Qumonte Williams Jr.

#83Qumonte Williams Jr.

Qumonte Williams Jr. is a Slot Specialist WR for Boise State.

What projects, and what doesn't · WRs · held out 2019-2025

How well one season predicts the next, measured on seasons the model never trained on. 1.00 would be perfectly predictable; 0.00 means last year told us nothing.

  • Usage share (volume)0.47
    Beats guessing the WR average by 16%. n=6,302 WR seasons
  • EPA per play (efficiency)0.09
    Not projectable — we do not forecast this. n=5,767 WR seasons
  • Total EPA (value)0.45
    Beats guessing the WR average by 12%. n=5,767 WR seasons

Across all positions, usage carries year to year at 0.47 and efficiency at 0.07. So Qumonte Williams Jr.'s projection is a projection of opportunity — how much of the offense he runs through. How well he converts it is something this model does not claim to know a year in advance, and the number above is why.

Performance Analysis · 2025 · vs WR peers

  • Efficiency0
  • Volume4
  • Explosiveness0
  • Consistency88
  • Pass-Down55
Player type
Slot Specialist WR

The offense's primary passing-down weapon — routes, separation, and reliability on 3rd down define this role.

3rd-down converterRoute technicianHigh passing-down share
Peer percentiles
Opponent-adjusted EPA (WEPA/play)0th %ile · below avg
Game-to-game consistency88th %ile · above avg
Key findings
  • Below-average efficiency vs WR peers — value comes through volume, not per-play impact.
  • Limited usage share suggests a rotational or specialist role.
  • High game-to-game consistency — reliable floor each week.

NIL Market Tier· 2025

On3 valuation ↗
Contributor

Rotational contributor. Smaller collective or local deals.

Tier is a model estimate based on position, school brand, performance rank, and usage — not a reported deal. NIL deals are private. For a real market valuation, see On3's NIL profile, which factors in social following and actual deal tracking.

Game Log · EPA per play, week by week

+1.1401.14Wk 2 vs Eastern Washington: -1.14 EPA/play2Wk 6 vs Notre Dame: -0.44 EPA/play6Wk 9 vs Nevada: -0.47 EPA/play9Wk 10 vs Fresno State: -0.76 EPA/play10
EPA per play · x-axis: weekabove 0 = added points · below = lost
WkOpponentResultOpp SP+EPA/playPassRush
2Eastern WashingtonW51-14-1.14-1.14
6Notre DameL7-2824.4-0.44-0.44
9NevadaW24-3-13.4-0.47-0.47
10Fresno StateL7-301.8-0.76-0.76

Usage & Situational · Pro

Snap-share proxy
Overall
1.4%
Passing plays
2.9%
Rushing plays
0.0%
Standard downs
1.1%
Passing downs
1.9%
EPA by down type
Standard downs
-0.47
Passing downs
-0.44
Pass / Rush EPA
-0.46 / —

Usage = share of team plays (CFBD has no true snap counts).

EPA = expected points added (opponent-adjusted). NIL estimates are model-based ranges, not reported deals. Data: CollegeFootballData. Not betting advice.